Rating: 
Summary: One of the Greatest Works of Fiction of the 20th Century
Review: It is a crime that the literary world views SF as nothing more than a second class citizen. This book is, without a doubt, one of the greatest works of fiction of the 20th Century. Because, however, it is also a classic of SF it is not considered to be noteworthy in that regard. Bradbury's prose can be compared to a surrealist painting. While the plot may seem straight forward, there is so much else to be seen and to know within the story. Definately, this is a book that any self respecting SF fan should be able to say that they have read.
Rating:
Summary: Scary. . .
Review: The book is not a standard SF and it is not meant to be. The idea is VERY plausible. Written 50 years ago, the idea of TV being a national obsession was ludicrous. Who knew? The white clown is very similar to the extremely violent shows that we let be on TV. And the books. . .the censorship. This is what will happen if we let censorship go any farther. And the scene where the women are discussing their children, absolutly scary. Good book. Read it.
Rating:
Summary: Unforgettable
Review: This is a profound book indeed, and I don't know how I can hope to do it justice. I think in many ways, Ray Bradbury is after us to think about happiness, and when we are better off being unhappy. This comes up several times -- the twisted, tragically fallen Fire Captain Beatty calls his firemen "The Happiness Boys" because they make melancholy and thoughtfulness more difficult, by burning literature. Later, when the hero -- Montag, the book-burning fireman who begins to question his job -- confronts his wife's friends, he tries as hard as possible to make them UNhappy about their boring lives, in the hope that it will wake them up to the world around them... The very first sentence of the book states "It was a pleasure to burn", referring to Montag before he begins to wake up, and become an unhappy, sympathetic human being... Bradbury is getting at some important things here, such as how we can be most peaceful inside when we are questioning, when we are not happy. Older readers might want to think about reading John Milton's "L'Allegro" and "Il Penseroso" to flesh out their own personal response to this book. I think younger readers, who could be reading this for school, might be interested in renting the movie "Logan's Run". Both stories are about future societies, where order and happiness are maintained by weeding out anyone who seems capable of independent thought. In this story, that means burning all books. In "Logan's Run", it means simply killing anyone who starts to get too old, who might start to have a little perspective. In both stories, the main character is a member of the elite, with a personal, professional stake in maintaining order, who suddenly begins to question the whole system, and ends up siding with his "enemies", the thoughtful people. At any rate, this is really quite a tremendous book, and I hope a lot of people read it.
Rating: 
Summary: Excellent intellectual read
Review: It is almost uncanny that Bradbury depicted this as the exaggerated furture for books. Certainly this is not an action packed blood bath but it is excting. He shows all to well how books full of literary beauty will be removed from view in public schools, libraries, etc. If you want to read a classic book this is just what you are looking for. It is set in the future where media dominates the earth and reading is believed to be a rash on society. As you read through and discover how well he depicted what is happening you will be vastly impressed how right he is. This is a must read book for those who want a good read and for literary knowedge. Despite all this, the reason I didn't give it five stars is because I do like action and this lacks some of what it could have.
Rating: 
Summary: Book burning, Boss burning, burning questions...
Review: I remember a talk given by Bruno Bettelheim in which he said that in a modern mass-society, the constant fascination with speed and movement betrays the inner emptiness of "a hollow man":"Instead of asking where we are [inwardly], we just jump into the car and say 'Let's get going'." Nietzsche always reserved his strongest diatribes for "the rule of men who are the mass". 'Fahrenheit 451' caricatures and develops these ideas to their extreme, if not logical, conclusion.. The plot is generated by the awakening of conscience in a (heretofore enthusiastic) mechanical servant of a soulless, grassroots, Orwellian government. Guy Montag, the protagonist, starts questioning the very official premises upon which his culture is founded: constant non-stop mindless entertainment, endemic disrespect for life, lots of motion and very little introspection. Books are found to be antagonist to this futuristic world premise, which is more or less an unholy mixture of Montel Williams and Barney, and so "firemen" BURN books, whenever and wherever they can be ferreted out. A national life of quiet desperation is presented here. Bradbury divined back in the fifties that the little "-isms" rife in the US would begin to dominate the cultural scene, as we have now already witnessed. This book explores the moral and social implications, admittedly in an extreme form, of our present Zeitgeist. The novelty of the book keeps one fascinated to the end. Not a great book, to my mind, but one I enjoyed reading and would certainly recommend to others. Very much a "finger-on-the-pulse" book. Reading time: ~ 10 hours.
Rating: 
Summary: Unacceptable!
Review: This summer we read this book. I hated this book for several reasons. First of all, the story was way too jumpy. It started slow, and then randomly got fast. It had absolutly no suspense to it. I found myself forcing myself to read! I couldn't relate to any of the characters! For instance, some of the characters were too boring. Maybe if I read this book in this book in ten years I would have a different opinion. Another reason why I didn't like this book, is because the characters weren't seen enough. They were all just thrown in at different times. You didn't feel like you got to know them very well and I hate that. I would not recommend this book. I think that Ray Bradbury needs to rethink his book ideas! I do not want to be critical of Ray Bradbury, but really I couldn't stand this book. It had no meaning to me. It also, had a poor plot and setting. For instance, it was plotted in the future yet it was no different than today. I don't plan on reading anymore or Ray Bradbury's books!
Rating:
Summary: Hardly even deserves 1 star
Review: This is definitely one of the WORST books I have ever come across. In the modern version, there is a forword and an introduction. Both of them have nothing to do with the story, and Ray Bradbury babbles on and on about his past and how he came up with the ideas for other books that NO ONE CARES ABOUT! I almost fell asleep during the forword, I dont know how I survived the book. The book drags on and one at a painfully slow pace. As for Ray Bradbury himself, he states in the introduction that in his eyes, Hitler burning and brutally killing people is on the same level as the burning of a book. I think that this statement is pretty much self explanatory for his views on humanity. Great guy, eh?
Rating:
Summary: The Worst book I have ever read!!!!
Review: This book was horribly written!! It confused more than it enlightened!!! I did not enjoy it at all and I never plan to read it again.
Rating:
Summary: GOOD SHyT
Review: THIS SHyT IS FREAKY AND REALLY COOL YOU SHOULD GIVE IT A TRY YOU WILL LIKE IT TRUST ME
Rating:
Summary: Alongside Orwell and Huxley
Review: You don't to admit it, but the surreal world that is depicted in this text, as with BRAVE NEW WORLD and 1984, has already arrived. A great anti-censorship pamplet in and of itself. It is one of the banned books of the 20th century. Irony indeed.
|
