Rating: 
Summary: Decent
Review: A very decent book and an interesting read, but Buckley's
fictional account of some of Jim Angleton's anti-communist
work lacks enough detail to really prove engaging.
As a mystery, the story seems a little weak, but passable.
A more glaring omission is Buckley's usual detailed knowledge
and background, and we are allowed only the slightest insight
into Angleton's thinking and motivation. It's especially glaring here because the author has significant knowledge
of the events and eras covered, but he has chosen not to share
it with the reader.
Angleton was the CIA's Chief of Counterintelligence for 20
years, and he was one of the leading anti-communist fighters
of all time, and he devoted his life to that cause, and we
have to wish Buckley would have shared significantly more of
his insights and knowledge. Even in a fictionalized account,
the author could have easily added far more interesting details
and stories.
This work is barely an introduction to either the life and times
of the famous Angleton or to the enormous anti-communist
effort so many Westerners made for decades.
This is a book to read in between more serious pursuits.
Rating: 
Summary: Cold Warrior or Soviet Dupe???
Review: Being somewhat familar with this genre, I was quite amused with the back alley tidbits with which Buckley sprinkles this light hearted tome. Unfortunately, another work on Angleton, "Cold Warrior" does not give us a "House of Mirrors" portrait of Angelton to pose against Buckley's oh-so-clever innuendo & Georgetown gossip. But it is fascinating to see how Buckley portrays the Philby-Angelton connection, with Golitsyn as a Soviet disinformation Mephistopheles to feed Angeltons alcoholic paranoid delusions.One wonders if Angelton really slept with the murdered-on-the-Towpath Kennedy mistress, and retreived her diary to protect JFK or himself? Although Buckley mentions Hollis in passing [together with Burgess, Maclean, Philby & Blunt],the book ends with a sardonic choice: Was Colby or Angelton the Fifth Man of the latest version of The Trust? Both were not responsible for the Ames/Hanssen round, but both were in place during the Walker & Falcon/Snowman runs. Was Pollard an Angelton protege, ala Crespi? The Lovestone comments are worth the price of admission, albeit the technique was used by Nixon against Allende. One appreciates Buckley's discussion of the damage caused by NSA's Martin & Mitchell, and the Army Driver who was exempt from full searches entering and leaving No Such Agency, since he ran bootleg errands for the top NSA brass, before Costco & Sam's Club displaced the Fort Meade Exchange & Commissary. Orchids to orchids and dust to dust,
if the booze don't get you, Nosenko must. hUMPTY dUMPTY
Rating:
Summary: Cold Warrior or Soviet Dupe???
Review: Being somewhat familar with this genre, I was quite amused with the back alley tidbits with which Buckley sprinkles this light hearted tome. Unfortunately, another work on Angleton, "Cold Warrior" does not give us a "House of Mirrors" portrait of Angelton to pose against Buckley's oh-so-clever innuendo & Georgetown gossip. But it is fascinating to see how Buckley portrays the Philby-Angelton connection, with Golitsyn as a Soviet disinformation Mephistopheles to feed Angeltons alcoholic paranoid delusions. One wonders if Angelton really slept with the murdered-on-the-Towpath Kennedy mistress, and retreived her diary to protect JFK or himself? Although Buckley mentions Hollis in passing [together with Burgess, Maclean, Philby & Blunt],the book ends with a sardonic choice: Was Colby or Angelton the Fifth Man of the latest version of The Trust? Both were not responsible for the Ames/Hanssen round, but both were in place during the Walker & Falcon/Snowman runs. Was Pollard an Angelton protege, ala Crespi? The Lovestone comments are worth the price of admission, albeit the technique was used by Nixon against Allende. One appreciates Buckley's discussion of the damage caused by NSA's Martin & Mitchell, and the Army Driver who was exempt from full searches entering and leaving No Such Agency, since he ran bootleg errands for the top NSA brass, before Costco & Sam's Club displaced the Fort Meade Exchange & Commissary. Orchids to orchids and dust to dust,
if the booze don't get you, Nosenko must. hUMPTY dUMPTY
Rating:
Summary: Cold Warrior or Soviet Dupe???
Review: Being somewhat familar with this genre, I was quite amused with the back alley tidbits with which Buckley sprinkles this light hearted tome. Unfortunately, another work on Angleton, "Cold Warrior" does not give us a "House of Mirrors" portrait of Angelton to pose against Buckley's oh-so-clever innuendo & Georgetown gossip. But it is fascinating to see how Buckley portrays the Philby-Angelton connection, with Golitsyn as a Soviet disinformation Mephistopheles to feed Angeltons alcoholic paranoid delusions. One wonders if Angelton really slept with the murdered-on-the-Towpath Kennedy mistress, and retreived her diary to protect JFK or himself? Although Buckley mentions Hollis in passing [together with Burgess, Maclean, Philby & Blunt],the book ends with a sardonic choice: Was Colby or Angelton the Fifth Man of the latest version of The Trust? Both were not responsible for the Ames/Hanssen round, but both were in place during the Walker & Falcon/Snowman runs. Was Pollard an Angelton protege, ala Crespi? The Lovestone comments are worth the price of admission, albeit the technique was used by Nixon against Allende. One appreciates Buckley's discussion of the damage caused by NSA's Martin & Mitchell, and the Army Driver who was exempt from full searches entering and leaving No Such Agency, since he ran bootleg errands for the top NSA brass, before Costco & Sam's Club displaced the Fort Meade Exchange & Commissary. Orchids to orchids and dust to dust,
if the booze don't get you, Nosenko must. hUMPTY dUMPTY
Rating:
Summary: Buckley can do better
Review: Buckley is a major American writer, and his fiction is better than many give him credit for. However, I think he's overreached in "Spytime," which is an ungainly mix of history, an implausible spy potboiler, and a stab at identifying the legendary "fifth man" in Philby's circle. The book feels as if Buckley just wants to write a silly spy novel. He could write a good one if he didn't force himself to include such an endless parade of historical characters, whose actions have to be at least plausibly reconciled with the facts. Countless heads of state, spymasters, and spies march across these pages without adding much to the leading characters or the plot. At the end, Buckley makes an intriguing stab at the fifth man. I think he's been nursing this theory for a while and wrote the book in order to publicize it. I wish he had just told us flat out, and then written the novel he wanted to write.
Rating:
Summary: Cold War Fractals
Review: Buckley's prose seems dictated, with minimal editing. His characters are mostly uninteresting and undeveloped, and the plot and story line are flimsy at best. Thank goodness I read a library copy; I'd have felt scammed if I paid hard-earned cash for this one. Come on, Buckley; it takes more than the profit motive to justify publishing novels.
Rating: 
Summary: Buckley Owes Us Better
Review: Buckley's prose seems dictated, with minimal editing. His characters are mostly uninteresting and undeveloped, and the plot and story line are flimsy at best. Thank goodness I read a library copy; I'd have felt scammed if I paid hard-earned cash for this one. Come on, Buckley; it takes more than the profit motive to justify publishing novels.
Rating: 
Summary: Buckley Can Do Better
Review: I am looking forward to reading the Mangold biography. As fiction Buckley's work is below par. I had expected more from him, the scholar that he is. This book pretends to clear Angleton,when it doesn't present enough factual detail to do this. Then it ends on a surprise note, accusing his superior without presenting any facts. Fiction can do more than simply tell or dramatize a story. I believe Harlot's Ghost by Norman Mailer, though not complete, does a better job covering some of this same information. Admittedly the latter requires a sequel to finish the job.
Rating:
Summary: Sorry, wrong personal obsession
Review: I have been concerned about finding an analytical book on "The Undoing Of James Jesus Angleton," as counterintelligence has been one of the strongest enemies which clear thinking had to face during his lifetime, and for far too long since then. Trying to understand this on an individual level which is much more familiar in the literature of our time, SPYTIME by William F. Buckley, Jr. uses the style of the typical mystery detective to muse on the inner confusion which drove the ideology of secrecy in search of "The Golitsyn Epiphany: the United States Government continued unaware of the lengths to which Soviet policy was based on persistent, systematic, dogged disinformation and deception." (p. 144). Chapter 56 covers Angleton's last 45 minutes on the job, from DCI Colby's "Effective at noon today you are relieved of all duties," (p. 299) but Colby didn't actually say that his job was being terminated, so naturally James Jesus Angleton kept thinking along the same lines as throughout the book, obsessing on what is going to happen to things in his safe at "almost two in the morning." (p. 302). The final chapter is clearly from Angleton's point of view. "I am doing an important exercise." (p. 303). In the end, the nature of Angleton's personal obsession is made perfectly clear, but the vast stretched time in which the book is set, skipping from December, 1962 (Chapter 36, p. 205) to January, 1966 (Chapter 51, p. 271) to November, 1972 (Chapter 52, p. 276) to February, 1973 (Chapter 53, p. 281) to 1974 for the final chapters, manages to miss the length of time the agency lost to confusion in unnecessary disputes, as: "On the matter of Nosenko, for instance, I [Angleton] ruled that his credentials were suspect." (pp. 291-2). If ever an agency did not want to believe what a Soviet agent was saying (the best example of a perfect failure since the great tragedy "Oedipus Rex"), it was whenever Nosenko was talking to the CIA, but the ability of intelligence to defeat itself is not what this book is about.
Rating:
Summary: Eloquent writing, well paced but not thrilling
Review: I think any bibliophile appreciates reading any writing by Buckley who makes the most simple passages eloquent and vivid. Reading Spytimes is no different (except for the sex scenes that were arkward and cumbersome). It was an introduction for me to this era of subterfuge within our government. I was not familiar at all with the historical characters of the novel, so I did not have the background data that other reviewers have possessed.
I found the book engaging but not thrilling or suspenseful. It flowed consistently and held my attention. It is good historical fiction, providing enlightenment and fabricating details to fill in spaces. This book is not lengthy so did not go into much character depth or background information on situations.
It is revealing about the CIA and counterintelligence process, as well as the divided loyalties of high officials. I'm sure Buckley draws on much personal knowledge to offer readers a realistic view of the intelligence realm of government.
I think it is a worthy read for those who have interest in spy stories and who appreciate fine writing. But don't expect to be blown away with intrigue.
|
