Rating: 
Summary: Highly recommended
Review: A GOOD political book challenges fence-sitters to take a stand, forces strong partisans to defend their position, entices some of the apolitical to start paying attention, incites vigorous debate, enlightens, and entertains. An OUTSTANDING political book does all these things plus is a catalyst that leads people to change their view regarding things they thought they understood but didn't. You can love her or hate her, that's irrelevent. With TREASON Ann Coulter has given us an OUTSTANDING political book, one of the best that has come along in years. Get it and read it.
Rating: 
Summary: STOLEN ELECTIONS ,ILLEGAL WARS , AND RIGHT WING APOLOGISTS.
Review: AFTER THE FIGHT A TOMBSTONE WHITE
WITH THE NAME OF THE LATE DECEASED
WITH EPITAPH DREAR A "FOOL LIES HERE
WHO TRIED TO HUSTLE THE EAST"
-RUDYARD KIPLINGThank you Ann for exemplifying the the true face of the republican party.And remember . . . It's much easier to steal an election than it is to steal a country.
Rating: 
Summary: Before You Read This
Review: Read David Brock's Blinded By The Right (don't let the title put you off), which is an excellent precursor to Ms. Coulter's works to the extent that it offers a telling perspective on the extent of her factual research and overall journalistic integrity.
Rating:
Summary: Another :Tell It Like It Is" by Ann Coulter
Review: You may have to search hard at your local liberal book store to find this book , but this book is well worth reading. Just look behind all the unsold Hillary Clinton books. Ann you rule even without all the promotion the media has given Hillary Rotten's book and how surprised she was to learn her cheating husband was cheating (????????????).
Rating:
Summary: Liberals Are On The Wrong Side Again
Review: Liberals have not learned anything from their experience during the Cold War. They were on the wrong side then and they have been on the wrong side again in the war on terrorism. Ann Coulter does an excellent job of comparing the attitudes and actions of liberals in both conflicts. There is nothing wrong with being concerned about the welfare of the prisoners at Guantanamo but a little interest in the soldiers guarding them will also be appreciated.
Rating:
Summary: Blonde Hate
Review: The ultra-conservative right is nuts. I try not to get wrapped up in extremism, but my grandparents turned into hateful racists lately so I decided to read some of the books they turn to for inspiration. Between this book and Mike Savage's diatribe, I'm convinced that the right is a loosely banded group of misanthropes. The lasting impression I got was hate. All they seem to espouse is a thinly veiled hate for everyone they don't know intimately. No leftist leaning books are filled with nearly as much venom.
Rating:
Summary: A perfect articulation of the absurdity of liberalism
Review: Coulter is so adept articulating the absurdity of modern day liberalism. In an era of political correctness and moral relativish, Ann cuts through the political noise of the times with an effective historical submission that is thoughtful, truthful, balanced. The Left will scream and rant, but what else is new?
Rating: 
Summary: Defending Joe McCarthy Is A Waste Of Time
Review: Ann Coulter makes some good points in TREASON. I wish, however, that less space was devoted to a defense of Joe McCarthy. If the author eliminated the personal attacks on some of her enemies, the book would then have more credibility - but of course it would not be quite so entertaining. On balance TREASON was definitely a worthwhile reading experience.
Rating:
Summary: I feel no need to ramble on about what I think of this book
Review: Ann Coulter is a very bad woman. I feel sad that there are people that actually read the book and liked it.
Rating:
Summary: Chickens come home to roost
Review: The online criticisms of Treason are sputtering, incoherent rage. This venom oozes out in attacks on her writing style (which the Los Angeles Times calls "bright...refreshing and provacative reading" and which the Washington Post calls "...a fluent polemicist with a gifr for Menckenesque invective...and she can harness language to sbutle, syllogistic argument.") The professional reviewers for newspapers which loath her conclusions believe that she writes well. The fundamental problem is that the left was horribly and monstrously wrong about the Cold War. The level of Soviet penetration of American government and society has been well documented by liberals, beginning with Weinstein's book on Alger Hiss twenty-five years ago, which began as an attempt to exonerate Hiss and ended with an absolute and reluctant proof that Hiss was utterly guilty. Venona, Soviet files, recantations by once respected leftists, statements by KGB and GRU agents - nothing will ever persuade many on the left that they were duped or willingly helped traitors to add immeasurable human misery because of their leftist bigotries. Coulter's "problem" to leftists is that she pulls no punches. Why should she? Some of us expected after all the proof of Soviet infiltration that a few leftists would say something like "I'm sorry" - if not to us, at least to the 100 Million dead bodies communism produced or the 1.5 Billion slaves of communism. But no. Just be quiet. Just move on. Pretend that communism was not as bad or worse than Nazism or Fascism. Or do what Ted Hall's wife did when confronted with his treason - claim it was necessary to give a vile anti-Semite, a torturer and the one-time ally of Adolph Hitler the atomic bomb because the Vozd was somehow more "progressive" than American leaders. Ann - and the rest of us - will no more forget this holocaust than we will forget the holocaust of Jews, Poles, Gipsies and others under the Nazis.
| 
