Home :: Books :: Biographies & Memoirs  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs

Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
Marcia Clark: Her Private Trials and Public Triumps

Marcia Clark: Her Private Trials and Public Triumps

List Price: $5.99
Your Price:
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Marcia Clark: The Couragous Woman
Review: Marcia Clark: Her Private Trials and Public Triumps, by Clifford L. Linedecker takes an exclusive look at one of the greatest lawyers involved in the Case of The People v.s O.J. Simpson.

One of the key attorney's in the "Trial of the Century" was Marcia Clark. Ms. Clark was on the case from day one. When the evidence against O.J. Simpson begain to pile up she began to work stagities to convict O.J Simpson. Clark along with her male counterparts worked 3/4 days trying to put all of the pieces together. Her plan going into the case was to show that O.J. had a history of abusing Nicole Brown, and stalking Ronald Goldman. Although Marica did a great job on the Case against Simpson her Private life turned public, and allowed her enemies, and the greedy, tastless, tabloid press take advantage of there personal demintions. Marica's ex husband decided to try and take her son away from her in the middle of the trial. Although she prevailed it cause her great pain that never went away. And if that was not enough there were rumors the she and Christoper Darden were sleeping together. The press had a field day trying to unjustly denounce Marcia Clark.

In spite of her greatest attempts to convict O.J. by using her "mountain of evidence" the evidence proved to be fallible. The defense proved that her case surrond reasonable doubt. For example; the viedo tape played by Johnnie Cochran showed the jurors that the bloody socks were not located by the foot of the bed 15 min. before the police "discovered them". Question. How could the socks be at the foot of the bed, when we see that they were not there 15 minutes before? What about the racism of Mark Furhman. She was told about his racist past and she chose to ignore it, then blame the defense for playing the "race card". Why did she not investigate Mr. Furhman, as she was asked to do? Somebody planned evidence. There was reasonable doubt that forced the jury to aquit O.J. Simpson. The law states that if there is reasonable doubt, you must aquit the acuse! That is the Law, not a race issue!

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Marcia Clark: The Couragous Woman
Review: Marcia Clark: Her Private Trials and Public Triumps, by Clifford L. Linedecker takes an exclusive look at one of the greatest lawyers involved in the Case of The People v.s O.J. Simpson.

One of the key attorney's in the "Trial of the Century" was Marcia Clark. Ms. Clark was on the case from day one. When the evidence against O.J. Simpson begain to pile up she began to work stagities to convict O.J Simpson. Clark along with her male counterparts worked 3/4 days trying to put all of the pieces together. Her plan going into the case was to show that O.J. had a history of abusing Nicole Brown, and stalking Ronald Goldman. Although Marica did a great job on the Case against Simpson her Private life turned public, and allowed her enemies, and the greedy, tastless, tabloid press take advantage of there personal demintions. Marica's ex husband decided to try and take her son away from her in the middle of the trial. Although she prevailed it cause her great pain that never went away. And if that was not enough there were rumors the she and Christoper Darden were sleeping together. The press had a field day trying to unjustly denounce Marcia Clark.

In spite of her greatest attempts to convict O.J. by using her "mountain of evidence" the evidence proved to be fallible. The defense proved that her case surrond reasonable doubt. For example; the viedo tape played by Johnnie Cochran showed the jurors that the bloody socks were not located by the foot of the bed 15 min. before the police "discovered them". Question. How could the socks be at the foot of the bed, when we see that they were not there 15 minutes before? What about the racism of Mark Furhman. She was told about his racist past and she chose to ignore it, then blame the defense for playing the "race card". Why did she not investigate Mr. Furhman, as she was asked to do? Somebody planned evidence. There was reasonable doubt that forced the jury to aquit O.J. Simpson. The law states that if there is reasonable doubt, you must aquit the acuse! That is the Law, not a race issue!


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates