<< 1 >>
Rating:  Summary: Essential Researchers' Reference Review: The thesis of the book is that research in strategy needs to be directed at fundamental questions, like "Why are firms different (despite attempts to imitate one another)?" The writers don't even bother to discuss the popular sillyness of advising firms to be "quick" or "invest in IT" and so on. Rather, there is a real attempt to describe what is known and not known about fundamental issues, like imitability.The book's strength is the quality of the 22 authors involved. It is the strongest showing of intellectual talent on this subject ever assembled. The weakness is that it was written just before the rise of "competence-based" views of strategy, so that it offers little perspective on that literature. Twelve years after the papers in this book were written, it remains an essential reference to research in strategy. MBAs and business people looking for the newest guru ideas should stay away---there are plenty of guru books out there to satisfy their needs for cool hip ideas ("seek chaos!").
Rating:  Summary: Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda Review: This book is not recomended for undergraduate, you must thinking hardly to understand the "soul" of this book. Read it carefully, once you read it, you will understand why the titled is "Research Agenda", but anyway, this is usefull book for a reference in research or comprehensive analysis in area of strategy.
Rating:  Summary: Essential Researchers' Reference Review: This book is not recomended for undergraduate, you must thinking hardly to understand the "soul" of this book. Read it carefully, once you read it, you will understand why the titled is "Research Agenda", but anyway, this is usefull book for a reference in research or comprehensive analysis in area of strategy.
<< 1 >>
|