Nattering on the Net: Women, Power and Cyberspace

Rating:
Summary: There's only one chapter about cyberspace, kids.
Review: I definitely expected something different, but was not entirely disappointed with this book. Basically, Spender spends 95% of this book making sure the reader knows that women have seldom been dealt a fair hand when it comes to technological advances that involve the spread of information. A good introduction for people who've been living in a cave for thousands of years. She basically uses a brief chapter on the implications of cyberspace for women - how it is paramount that they be taught to use computers, etc., if they are to survive in the world of men - to bring her argument full-circle. A good read, but I expected more cyber-goodness.

Rating:
Summary: Excellent, informative, well-written book
Review: I thoroughly enjoyed this book, which is not at all a how-to manual, but a philosophical yet lively, easy-to-read analysis of women and the internet: how the new medium affects how they relate to men, each other and the technology itself. Highly recommended for anyone interested in feminism, whether or not they have on-line experience.

Rating:
Summary: Badly researched and a pre-determined agenda
Review: This book made my blood boil! I'd give it no stars if I could.

Dale Spender presents her own biased observations as fact, wrapped up in the "women as victim" agenda. Just like the early scientists who used the emerging evolutionary theory to support the "primacy of white man", this is an arrogant and badly one-sided "history" that presents cyberspace and technology as yet another male bastion built to keep the women-folk out.

As a woman who was in on the net before anyone but uni students had heard of it, I have to say that she is badly, badly mistaken. But she wouldn't know that because she didn't talk to any of the men and women involved, she just projected her own assumptions and uses raw participation numbers to support them. Since she attacks the intent as well as the result, this is unconscionable.

If the contents of this book were presented as a research project at any university in the world, it would be knocked back for the lack of validation/triangulation to support the conclusions drawn.

In the four years since this book was published Spender has been proven very wrong. Access to cyberspace was and is now still, not determined by gender, but by economics!

Rating:
Summary: Badly researched and a pre-determined agenda
Review: This book made my blood boil! I'd give it no stars if I could.

Dale Spender presents her own biased observations as fact, wrapped up in the "women as victim" agenda. Just like the early scientists who used the emerging evolutionary theory to support the "primacy of white man", this is an arrogant and badly one-sided "history" that presents cyberspace and technology as yet another male bastion built to keep the women-folk out.

As a woman who was in on the net before anyone but uni students had heard of it, I have to say that she is badly, badly mistaken. But she wouldn't know that because she didn't talk to any of the men and women involved, she just projected her own assumptions and uses raw participation numbers to support them. Since she attacks the intent as well as the result, this is unconscionable.

If the contents of this book were presented as a research project at any university in the world, it would be knocked back for the lack of validation/triangulation to support the conclusions drawn.

In the four years since this book was published Spender has been proven very wrong. Access to cyberspace was and is now still, not determined by gender, but by economics!