<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Agree with the previous reviewer.
Review: It i s possible to use the text, mainly for editing.
The content does not go to the point. The examples simplicity make them irrelevant. On the whole a text which avoids a concise, clear, and intelligent style.As you might surmise I agree with the reviewer below. If thestar-rating scale included a minus section, this book would probably have earned a few stars on the minus end of the scale. This review is written mostly of solidarity with my fellow readers/programmers.
Rating:
Summary: Agree with the previous reviewer.
Review: It i s possible to use the text, mainly for editing.
The content does not go to the point. The examples simplicity make them irrelevant. On the whole a text which avoids a concise, clear, and intelligent style. As you might surmise I agree with the reviewer below. If thestar-rating scale included a minus section, this book would probably have earned a few stars on the minus end of the scale. This review is written mostly of solidarity with my fellow readers/programmers.
Rating:
Summary: The book is useless unless your doing a tech interview
Review: The book has no in depth information on CICS, no mention of background processes. The index pages don't match the contents of the book (try julian date for example). The map examples are most simplistic, never found in real life. Nobody codes like these examples. In short, hated it!
<< 1 >>
| 
