Home :: Books :: History  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History

Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
The Supreme Court's Greatest Hits 2.0 : Updated and Expanded

The Supreme Court's Greatest Hits 2.0 : Updated and Expanded

List Price: $39.95
Your Price: $25.17
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 2 >>

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Interesting, informative, and thorough
Review: I am not a lawyer. My interest in the Supreme Court is that of an interested observer, who has particular interest in certain topics (such as Establishment Clause, Religious Freedom, etc). Even so, or perhaps especially so, I find Goldmans' product wonderful. It has everything that was missing from Peter Irons' audio series "May it Please The Court" (which wasn't much to begin with).

The Supreme Court hears oral arguments on cases, and these arguments have been recorded since the fifties. Goldman's CD contains the full audio arguments for a number of cases, and, for a few of them, also the public announcement of the decision on the case. Each case also includes a summary, which has a brief description of the facts of the case, the final decision, and final vote (which justices voted in the majority, which in the minority). That alone would make this a wonderful addition to anybody interested in the Bill of Rights or the Supreme Court. But this is not all that Goldman brings to the party.

Also included are the full text of the decisions of the cases included (Majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions), which were sorely missed in Peter Irons' book. Also, for each case, a photograph of the Court's justices is provided, with a halo effect identifying majority and minority. By clicking on a particular justice, you can hear a voice clip, to help you identify their voices when, during the arguments, they interrupt or ask questions. There is also a "highlights" option, whereby specific points in the argument are mentioned, with time index stamps, so you can listen only to those points (the presentation of the case, particular questions regarding certain issues and their replies, summary, etc). You can also use this as a sort of abbreviated program when listening to the entire arguments (which can run over 1 hour). As opposed to Peter Irons' _May it Please The Court_, there is no commentary on the arguments, which are presented completely unedited, and also no transcripts. Finally, if there are any cases which were argued or decided together with the one you are looking at, it is so noted and you can take a look at that one as well.

You can look at the cases sorted by name or by date, and also by broad topic ("Religious Freedom", "Commerce", "Sexual Discrimination", etc), by Justices sitting on the Court, or all together. The cases include some of the more important and controversial of the past 50 years: Roe v. Wade (abortion), Abington v. Schemp (school prayer), Nixon v. U.S. (executive power), New York Times v. U.S. (pentagon papers), Johnson v. Texas (flag burning), Bakke v. Regents (reverse discrimination), and many more among its more than 50 cases.

I have no complaints about the final product, and only a few wishes: I hope to see sequels, with more cases, available; although pretty close to my wish list of cases, a couple I would love are still missing (e.g. Edwards v. Aguillard). I would also have liked to be able to look at cases by author of the opinion, but this is such a minor thing that it is hardly worth mentioning. Transcripts of the arguments would be a nice addition. These are such minor quibbles, however, that they cannot mute your enjoyment of this wonderful program.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Interesting, informative, and thorough
Review: I am not a lawyer. My interest in the Supreme Court is that of an interested observer, who has particular interest in certain topics (such as Establishment Clause, Religious Freedom, etc). Even so, or perhaps especially so, I find Goldmans' product wonderful. It has everything that was missing from Peter Irons' audio series "May it Please The Court" (which wasn't much to begin with).

The Supreme Court hears oral arguments on cases, and these arguments have been recorded since the fifties. Goldman's CD contains the full audio arguments for a number of cases, and, for a few of them, also the public announcement of the decision on the case. Each case also includes a summary, which has a brief description of the facts of the case, the final decision, and final vote (which justices voted in the majority, which in the minority). That alone would make this a wonderful addition to anybody interested in the Bill of Rights or the Supreme Court. But this is not all that Goldman brings to the party.

Also included are the full text of the decisions of the cases included (Majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions), which were sorely missed in Peter Irons' book. Also, for each case, a photograph of the Court's justices is provided, with a halo effect identifying majority and minority. By clicking on a particular justice, you can hear a voice clip, to help you identify their voices when, during the arguments, they interrupt or ask questions. There is also a "highlights" option, whereby specific points in the argument are mentioned, with time index stamps, so you can listen only to those points (the presentation of the case, particular questions regarding certain issues and their replies, summary, etc). You can also use this as a sort of abbreviated program when listening to the entire arguments (which can run over 1 hour). As opposed to Peter Irons' _May it Please The Court_, there is no commentary on the arguments, which are presented completely unedited, and also no transcripts. Finally, if there are any cases which were argued or decided together with the one you are looking at, it is so noted and you can take a look at that one as well.

You can look at the cases sorted by name or by date, and also by broad topic ("Religious Freedom", "Commerce", "Sexual Discrimination", etc), by Justices sitting on the Court, or all together. The cases include some of the more important and controversial of the past 50 years: Roe v. Wade (abortion), Abington v. Schemp (school prayer), Nixon v. U.S. (executive power), New York Times v. U.S. (pentagon papers), Johnson v. Texas (flag burning), Bakke v. Regents (reverse discrimination), and many more among its more than 50 cases.

I have no complaints about the final product, and only a few wishes: I hope to see sequels, with more cases, available; although pretty close to my wish list of cases, a couple I would love are still missing (e.g. Edwards v. Aguillard). I would also have liked to be able to look at cases by author of the opinion, but this is such a minor thing that it is hardly worth mentioning. Transcripts of the arguments would be a nice addition. These are such minor quibbles, however, that they cannot mute your enjoyment of this wonderful program.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Excellent way to learn about how the Court makes decisions
Review: I was lucky enough to get my hands on a beta version of this software. It is absolutely incredible, and I will definitely incorporate it into my undergraduate classes. However, this disk goes beyond classroom use. For the observer of the Court who only hears about what the justices do from the nightly news, this is a great way to learn about our nation's highest court.

I encourage anyone interested in hearing the justices at work to buy the Greatest Hits. It is an invaluable source of information.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: Adds tremendous depth to Sup. Ct. decisions
Review: If you are a lawyer, or a student of the law, you will find this CD-ROM especially illuminating as it illuminates famous Sup. Ct. cases with the actual audio arguments and questions by the judges. The subsequent reasoning and decision of the Court is a lot clearer when viewed in the context of how the oral pleadings went. RealAudio compression allows dozens of hours of listenable audio to be burnt onto a single CD. Well worth it.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: A Remarkable Resource
Review: Jerry Goldman has brought forth a veritable treasure trove: full-length oral arguments from fifty landmark Supreme Court cases! Words really cannot describe what a remarkable resource SCGH is--the promise of Peter Irons's audio-tape series "May It Please the Court" is here brought to full fruition. Listen to all or only the most salient parts of an argument: nobody acts as a gatekeeper to the material. Hear the verbal inflections of the justices as they ask questions--nuances that do not come across on the written page. A separate image of the particular Court deciding the case is available, along with the opportunity to hear voice samples of each Justice, so to familiarize yourself with who is talking during arguments. A halo effect comes across the members of the majority when the word itself is clicked, and the same thing happens to members of the minority. All this, along with oral announcements of the opinions, biographical data on the justices, and text of the full opinions. That this is contained on one compact disc is mind-boggling; SCGH is essential for those with any interest in Constitutional Law.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: A Remarkable Resource
Review: Jerry Goldman has brought forth a veritable treasure trove: full-length oral arguments from fifty landmark Supreme Court cases! Words really cannot describe what a remarkable resource SCGH is--the promise of Peter Irons's audio-tape series "May It Please the Court" is here brought to full fruition. Listen to all or only the most salient parts of an argument: nobody acts as a gatekeeper to the material. Hear the verbal inflections of the justices as they ask questions--nuances that do not come across on the written page. A separate image of the particular Court deciding the case is available, along with the opportunity to hear voice samples of each Justice, so to familiarize yourself with who is talking during arguments. A halo effect comes across the members of the majority when the word itself is clicked, and the same thing happens to members of the minority. All this, along with oral announcements of the opinions, biographical data on the justices, and text of the full opinions. That this is contained on one compact disc is mind-boggling; SCGH is essential for those with any interest in Constitutional Law.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: A multi-media wonder; an awesome front row seat to history!
Review: Like the OYEZ web site, the CD-ROM is great. I have listened to over 30 hours of oral arguments and have read over 25 opinions, often while I listen to the arguments. It is a great way to learn about American constitutional history, the law, the Supreme Court and the individual justices. You also learn alot about the lawyers who argued the cases, their strengths and weaknesses. This is a must for lawyers, law students, law professors and students of politics, at all levels. As a labor lawyer for 15 years, this is the best continuing education I could imagine. I have purchased several copies for friends and law schools.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: I love the supreme court!
Review: the supreme court is my life, i love it, i am doing a project oon the supreme court and i love it!i bought this cd-rom and i have not put it own since, my computer hasnt bee sut down in like 2 months, all it does is play this CD-ROM, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! OH I LOVE THE SUPREME COURT, JUSTICE REQUEST IS SOOO FINE!!

Rating: 0 stars
Summary: THE SUPREME COURT'S GREATEST HITS in brief
Review: This CD-ROM is a collection of full-length public proceedings recorded in the courtroom of the U.S. Supreme Court building. My principal objective is to make these important public proceedings widely accessible.

The Supreme Court began recording its public proceedings in October 1955. This CD-ROM contains 70+ hours of oral arguments and occasional opinion pronouncements in 50 constitutional cases argued and decided between 1956 and 1997. I have selected these cases for their historical significance and their current relevance to an understanding of the U.S. Constitution. The topics cover a wide range: first amendment issues, criminal defendant rights, privacy and personal autonomy, federalism, presidential power and more.

As Yogi Berra might has said, "You can hear a lot just by listening." The audio materials convey intellectual liveliness and emotive content -- skepticism, playfulness, humor, scorn, and gentility -- that will add a dynamic human dimension to the justices and the attorneys who argue before them. But listening to lengthy oral arguments may prove daunting in a world where time is at a premium. To make this experience efficient, I have highlighted portions of every argument, shortening considerably your listening investment. Of course, you can also listen to the unabridged versions at any time. To enhance comprehension, I have also added a feature that will enable you to learn the justices' voices so that you can identify the speakers.

Occasionally, the justices would hear arguments in several cases and then resolve all cases in a single opinion. To assure completeness to this collection, I have included arguments and highlights in all related cases. Whenever possible, I have included the Court's recorded opinion pronouncements. Listeners should find these materials especially engaging.

The CD operates with minimal hardware requirements for Windows95/98 and MacOS.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Superb Slice of History
Review: This is a remarkable CD. Listening to Abe Fortas argue Gideon v. Wainright alone is worth it. You don't have to be an attorney or a historian to appreciate the significance of these oral arguments which are accompanied with insightful text including biographies of Supreme Court justices and copies of opinions. I only wish it went further back in time but perhaps those sources aren't available.


<< 1 2 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates