Rating: 
Summary: the fragility of whiteness
Review: this is a fantastic collection of essays and poetry (2 poems). it is necessary for americans to finally come to terms with the fragility of being "white". why does being "white"-skinned, or having a white parent, not prevent the discrmination of Latinos, Blacks, and Asians? the simple truth is that "white" and "race" are all socially constructed "truths" to divide a potentially awe-inspiring nation of nations. what happens when "white" people wake up and call for an end to racial oppression? read the book...
Rating:
Summary: the fragility of whiteness
Review: this is a fantastic collection of essays and poetry (2 poems). it is necessary for americans to finally come to terms with the fragility of being "white". why does being "white"-skinned, or having a white parent, not prevent the discrmination of Latinos, Blacks, and Asians? the simple truth is that "white" and "race" are all socially constructed "truths" to divide a potentially awe-inspiring nation of nations. what happens when "white" people wake up and call for an end to racial oppression? read the book...
Rating: 
Summary: The Chosen Speak
Review: This is a great book to read to understand why Hilter is becoming more loved by young Whites then he was just a few years ago. The Chosen show their true mission; this is far better than the Elders Of Zion or even Klassen's books because it is from the horses mouth.
Rating:
Summary: Extremist Hate Literature
Review: While I did not read the whole book, I certainly believe I read more than enough to get an accurate impression of what the authors were trying to say. I found the general tone of this book extreme in its antagonism to anything the authors considers "white." and generous to anything "nonwhite." I think that the author is himself is probably a racial supremacist of some sort, and perhaps is quite jealous of those whites who have accomplished the worthwhile. Apparently all the ills of the world would disappear if the white race or "white privilege" were abolished. I think the general theme of the book might be summed up this way: If a white person commits a crime against a black (or non-white) person, the white person is at fault. If a black (or non-white) person commits a crime against a white person, the white person is at fault. No matter what the circumstances, or who is involved, it's the white person's fault, according to the author. What is the logical solution to what Ignatiev frames as the root problem? Eliminate the white person, or eliminate "white privilege" which somehow "triggers" all the woes of the world. Overall one of the most hate filled and nasty publications I've ever been exposed to.
Rating:
Summary: Extremist Hate Literature
Review: While I did not read the whole book, I certainly believe I read more than enough to get an accurate impression of what the authors were trying to say. I found the general tone of this book extreme in its antagonism to anything the authors considers "white." and generous to anything "nonwhite." I think that the author is himself is probably a racial supremacist of some sort, and perhaps is quite jealous of those whites who have accomplished the worthwhile. Apparently all the ills of the world would disappear if the white race or "white privilege" were abolished. I think the general theme of the book might be summed up this way: If a white person commits a crime against a black (or non-white) person, the white person is at fault. If a black (or non-white) person commits a crime against a white person, the white person is at fault. No matter what the circumstances, or who is involved, it's the white person's fault, according to the author. What is the logical solution to what Ignatiev frames as the root problem? Eliminate the white person, or eliminate "white privilege" which somehow "triggers" all the woes of the world. Overall one of the most hate filled and nasty publications I've ever been exposed to.
| 
