<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: A Detailed Account of the 22 Nuremberg Defendants
Review: Author Eugene Davidson has provided the reader with a 600 page account detailing the responsibilities of the 22 defendants who were tried in Nuremberg, Germany, for war crimes in World War II. The book is not a question and answer session of each one. Rather, it provides us with an account of what each man was responsible for in regard to Adolf Hitler's Third Reich. Most of the defendants were merely anti-semetic flunkies who parroted the beliefs of Hitler. Hjalmar Schacht had the highest I.Q. with 141 and Herman Goering was second with 139. I found the defendants to be a curious lot with each one openly disliking, jealous of, or not trusting the other. Had they pursued other endeavors rather than follow Hitler, some of them may very well have gone on to successful careers. These once powerful men appear to be a rather grandfatherly collection while sitting in the courtroom at Nuremberg. I did find the book to be kind of long, but if you are interested in learning about this cast of characters this would be a good book for you to read.
Rating:
Summary: A Detailed Account of the 22 Nuremberg Defendants
Review: Author Eugene Davidson has provided the reader with a 600 page account detailing the responsibilities of the 22 defendants who were tried in Nuremberg, Germany, for war crimes in World War II. The book is not a question and answer session of each one. Rather, it provides us with an account of what each man was responsible for in regard to Adolf Hitler's Third Reich. Most of the defendants were merely anti-semetic flunkies who parroted the beliefs of Hitler. Hjalmar Schacht had the highest I.Q. with 141 and Herman Goering was second with 139. I found the defendants to be a curious lot with each one openly disliking, jealous of, or not trusting the other. Had they pursued other endeavors rather than follow Hitler, some of them may very well have gone on to successful careers. These once powerful men appear to be a rather grandfatherly collection while sitting in the courtroom at Nuremberg. I did find the book to be kind of long, but if you are interested in learning about this cast of characters this would be a good book for you to read.
Rating: 
Summary: Good Account
Review: From a man who was there. Is there a better way of getting a first hand account of the trial. The book allows for a good read on the trial. It is in-depth and eventful and it is easy to read. This is a good reference book to have in any European History collection after 1945.
Rating:
Summary: Read The Title Carefully...
Review: If you are looking for a day-by-day account of the proceedings of the Nuremberg tribunal, then you will be somewhat disappointed by this book. (If that is what you're after, try Gilbert's "Nuremberg Diary.") An introductory chapter certainly outlines how the tribunal came into being, and Davidson deals with the jurisprudence of Nuremberg (i.e. Was it really a trial? Or was it revenge?) in his concluding chapter, but the bulk of this book is not given over to a daily account of the proceedings at Nuremberg.Instead, this book is literally an "Account of the twenty-two defendants at Nuremberg." Taking each defendant in turn, Davidson gives us a neatly potted account of their history, their involvement in the Nazi regime, their relationships with other high-ranking Nazis and ultimately, decides the extent of their guilt. In short, the reader is provided with 22 "mini-biographies." The conduct of many defendants at the trial is occasionally discussed, but that usually takes second place to the historical data. This books does contain some fascinating insights on the working relationships between the various Nazi officials. In almost every case, one is struck by the realisation that any given minister was in conflict with almost everyone else. For instance, Speer got along admirably with Hitler (until 1944, at least), but he distrusted almost everyone else in the Nazi hierarchy. Likewise, Kaltenbrunner appeared to regard almost everyone except the Fuehrer as his enemy. It seems that all of these defendants were trying to zealously protect their own sphere of interest and fend off all those who attempted to enroach upon them. In general then, this book makes for stimulating reading. As for Nuremberg itself, Davidson concludes: "In a world of mixed human affairs where rough justice is done...Nuremberg may be defended as a political event if not as a court." and "In a certain sense, the trial succeeded in doing what judicial proceedings are supposed to do: it convinced even the guilty that the verdict against them was just."
Rating:
Summary: Read The Title Carefully...
Review: If you are looking for a day-by-day account of the proceedings of the Nuremberg tribunal, then you will be somewhat disappointed by this book. (If that is what you're after, try Gilbert's "Nuremberg Diary.") An introductory chapter certainly outlines how the tribunal came into being, and Davidson deals with the jurisprudence of Nuremberg (i.e. Was it really a trial? Or was it revenge?) in his concluding chapter, but the bulk of this book is not given over to a daily account of the proceedings at Nuremberg. Instead, this book is literally an "Account of the twenty-two defendants at Nuremberg." Taking each defendant in turn, Davidson gives us a neatly potted account of their history, their involvement in the Nazi regime, their relationships with other high-ranking Nazis and ultimately, decides the extent of their guilt. In short, the reader is provided with 22 "mini-biographies." The conduct of many defendants at the trial is occasionally discussed, but that usually takes second place to the historical data. This books does contain some fascinating insights on the working relationships between the various Nazi officials. In almost every case, one is struck by the realisation that any given minister was in conflict with almost everyone else. For instance, Speer got along admirably with Hitler (until 1944, at least), but he distrusted almost everyone else in the Nazi hierarchy. Likewise, Kaltenbrunner appeared to regard almost everyone except the Fuehrer as his enemy. It seems that all of these defendants were trying to zealously protect their own sphere of interest and fend off all those who attempted to enroach upon them. In general then, this book makes for stimulating reading. As for Nuremberg itself, Davidson concludes: "In a world of mixed human affairs where rough justice is done...Nuremberg may be defended as a political event if not as a court." and "In a certain sense, the trial succeeded in doing what judicial proceedings are supposed to do: it convinced even the guilty that the verdict against them was just."
Rating:
Summary: THE TRIAL
Review: One of the most important trials in history of Mankind.The lies,the pain ,anguish,the pupets in a strange chess game.One of the boos to understand modern history.
<< 1 >>
| 
