<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Biased research
Review: Anyone hoping to gain an objective insight into the complex tragedy of the GLF should avoid this book at all costs. Despite the author's reputation as a noted scholar in the field, he makes sweeping, generalized claims that are simply not documented. In discussing the negative aspects of the GLF, for example, all efforts are made to present Mao as not responsible--somehow separated from the policy-making process and therefore not responsible for the terrible consequences. The millions of deaths that resulted are acknowledged, but the author quickly points out that Mao did inspire millions of workers in China to work for the common good, as if this somehow compensated for the maniacal toll on the country. I don't know why Mr. Macfarquhar is such an apologist for Mao, but it clearly interferes with the balance of his analysis and would outrage any sensible student of Chinese history.
Rating: 
Summary: misleading book
Review: Anyone hoping to gain an objective insight into the complex tragedy of the GLF should avoid this book at all costs. Despite the author's reputation as a noted scholar in the field, he makes sweeping, generalized claims that are simply not documented. In discussing the negative aspects of the GLF, for example, all efforts are made to present Mao as not responsible--somehow separated from the policy-making process and therefore not responsible for the terrible consequences. The millions of deaths that resulted are acknowledged, but the author quickly points out that Mao did inspire millions of workers in China to work for the common good, as if this somehow compensated for the maniacal toll on the country. I don't know why Mr. Macfarquhar is such an apologist for Mao, but it clearly interferes with the balance of his analysis and would outrage any sensible student of Chinese history.
Rating:
Summary: Biased research
Review: I find this book as well as most of MacFarquhar's books (I have read several) to be fairly biased, though well-written. Here is MacFarquhar's strength and weakness. He is a good story-teller yet I find the work, from an academic standpoint, to be shoddy. He makes claims that are unsubstantiated as to what political elites in China were thinking. Basing his research on accounts written by others in a political system that is notorious for back-biting leaves me a bit concerned as to the veracity of his conclusions sine they are founded on perhaps erroneous information.I would have liked to have seen him conduct more interviews with the actual people he is writing on -- the ones that are still alive at least -- or with relatives of the people he is writing on. Then, he could triangulate these interviews with is sources to determine as close to the truth as possible. Unfortunatley, his work is way too dependent on one or two sources. Alas, MacFarquhar's books are the best on elite Chinese politics of the 60s and 70s -- only because no one else has really written on it. I would read the book for some fo the info but I would be wary of the conclusions and veracity of some ofthe arguments.
Rating: 
Summary: Authoritative Sourcebook
Review: Professor MacFarquhar presents an extremely thorough and readable account of elite politics in China from 1958-1960. While writing this book nearly two decades ago, he had access to hitherto unavailable memoirs and other personal accounts of the events surrounding the Great Leap Forward. He gives the reader a very balanced picture of Chairman Mao - an extremely complex leader who (I disagree with the previous reviewer on this) cannot be called "evil." Mao was no Stalin. Mao was no Hitler. The book reveals that the decision to launch the Great Leap Forward, while ultimately Mao's responsibility, was pushed along by external events and ambitious cadres. My only criticism of the book is that it focuses too much on elite politics. I would love to know more about what was going on in the countryside. All in all, however, THE ORIGINS OF THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION, VOL.2 is an excellent read. I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in modern Chinese politics.
<< 1 >>
| 
