<< 1 >>
Rating:  Summary: Zeros in on Luftwaffe tactics like a Norden bombsight Review: The book is a compilation of strategies and tactics used by the Luftwaffe -- as dictated by their highest commanders and prolific aces.Examples of this are: -strategies for attacking 4-engine heavy bombers -a typical FW-190 ground attack mission -technical details of various cannon and machine loads -a year-by-year summary of the Luftwaffe -- and why they lost the war If you're looking for fluff, drama, romance, glory -- then read one of the fine books by Len Deighton. If you want terse technical information from the top -- Adolf Galland -- then this is it. I happen to like both styles, and enjoy this book for the technical foundation it provides.
Rating:  Summary: The story of the Luftwaffe's fighter leaders Review: The book was written (or dictated) by Galland (and his co-authors) in 1945 when they were PoWs as part of their interrogation. This is, quite literally, the first draft of the Luftwaffe fighter force's history. On one hand, none of the many authors had documents (except logbooks) to refer back to. But their memories were fresh and, just being captured, they did not really have an interest in pushing a particular agenda except as it kept them from being tried for war crimes (one of the minor co-authors got 15 years). Galland is the main voice here, and he is always interesting. I met him, and he exuded charisma, leadership and the fighter pilots' disrespect for authority not legitimized by demonstrated capabilities. You get a lot of that in his writings. I also found interesting Heinz Bar's descriptions of what a fighter mission would have been like at different stages of the war. Hitschhold writes several chapters on air-ground operations and tactics, especially in the latter war period. This is an area not well covered in English-language sources. Readers of Rudel's STUKA PILOT might want to see how that corresponds to the situation as his boss saw it, without the ideological filters. If you are seriously interested in the Luftwaffe, you should buy this book. If you enjoyed Galland's classic THE FIRST AND THE LAST or the recent biography of Galland, you should buy this book. Because it was written by fighter pilots (as PoWs) for other fighter pilots (doing the interrogation), it assumes a fair degree of technical knowledge, so it is not for the neophyte. The translation, while understandable, is not polished. I suspect the authors, being true fighter pilots, did most of their talking with their hands.
Rating:  Summary: The story of the Luftwaffe's fighter leaders Review: The book was written (or dictated) by Galland (and his co-authors) in 1945 when they were PoWs as part of their interrogation. This is, quite literally, the first draft of the Luftwaffe fighter force's history. On one hand, none of the many authors had documents (except logbooks) to refer back to. But their memories were fresh and, just being captured, they did not really have an interest in pushing a particular agenda except as it kept them from being tried for war crimes (one of the minor co-authors got 15 years). Galland is the main voice here, and he is always interesting. I met him, and he exuded charisma, leadership and the fighter pilots' disrespect for authority not legitimized by demonstrated capabilities. You get a lot of that in his writings. I also found interesting Heinz Bar's descriptions of what a fighter mission would have been like at different stages of the war. Hitschhold writes several chapters on air-ground operations and tactics, especially in the latter war period. This is an area not well covered in English-language sources. Readers of Rudel's STUKA PILOT might want to see how that corresponds to the situation as his boss saw it, without the ideological filters. If you are seriously interested in the Luftwaffe, you should buy this book. If you enjoyed Galland's classic THE FIRST AND THE LAST or the recent biography of Galland, you should buy this book. Because it was written by fighter pilots (as PoWs) for other fighter pilots (doing the interrogation), it assumes a fair degree of technical knowledge, so it is not for the neophyte. The translation, while understandable, is not polished. I suspect the authors, being true fighter pilots, did most of their talking with their hands.
<< 1 >>
|