<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Monumental but hardly captivating
Review: This book tries to be both academic and a good read. Many writers stronger than Gordievsky failed when trying to achieve this. The authors obviously have a wealth of material at their disposal, but somehow structured approach is lacking. Still, if you have time and/or deep interest in the subject, it is a recommended read.
Rating: 
Summary: Flawed and incomplete yet still a good read
Review: When this book came out, it was considered to be groundbreaking and astonishing as far as new information about Soviet operations goes. However, it is almost completely irrelevant. If one takes a close look at the book and compares it with "The Mitrokhin Files" (Mitrokhin being another KGB officer who defected several years later), it will be noted that much of the information Gordievsky SHOULD HAVE KNOWN if he really had access to all top Soviet files is missing. This, along with several other contradictory statements, leads us to conclude that the Soviets knew of Gordievsky's activities and so were using him to feed false and/or irrelevant information to the West.
Rating: 
Summary: the most repeatedly astonishing book i have read
Review: yep - i give it 5 stars too the most repeatedly astonishing book i have read methinks - the commies managed to penetrate western security totally only for stalin to totally ignore or misinterpret its meaning due to paranoia about the west the methods, results & ruthlessnes are grim but rivetting reading
<< 1 >>
| 
