Talk of the Devil: Encounters With Seven Dictators

Rating:
Summary: Jaruzelski in bad company
Review: I would highly recommend "Talk of the Devil" to anyone with an interest in politics and/or history. I loved reading the book and read it almost non-stop from beginning to end. However, I strongly believe that General Jaruzelski does not belong in this book. General Jaruzelski is guilty of having declared martial law in 1981, which may or may have not blocked a Soviet invasion of Poland, and he may or may not share guilt in the shooting of 44 demonstrators in 1970 when he was defense minister. During the interview, in a house provided by the Polish government drinking vodka from plastic cups, Jaruzelski directly addressed these issues. Whereas the others in the book avoided saying they did anything wrong. The magnitude of Jaruzelski's crimes pale in comparison to others in the book; Mengistu Haile-Mariam who Amnesty International estimates killed 500,000 Ethiopians, Jean-Claude Duvalier who stole $900 million from the Haitian people, Idi Amin-Dada who had an unfaithful mistress hatched to pieces then had her limbs sewn back on backwards and showed her to people to scare them into being loyal, and Jean-Bedel Bokassa who alleged to have killed and eaten his political opponents! But regardless of his inclusion in the book it gets a 4 star rating from me.

Rating:
Summary: A cool reflection about the banality of evil
Review: Mister Orizio has written a slim and elegant volume, with a greater depth of thought that seems at first sight.
I think that evil -and evil doers- are one of the lasting themes of reflection of mankind. The author, in the present book, adds an interesting point of view which certainly is thought-provoking.
He focuses on seven dictators -well, six: Amin, Bokassa, Mengitsu, Duvalier, Milosevic, Jaruzelski, plus Hoxha's wife-, tries to have a personal interview with them and conveys their words to us. Sometimes the interviews are too short or not very juicy -for example, Amin's one- but Orizio always gives us three important things: the context in which every dictator acted, a sketch of his deeds and some interesting -even humorous- remarks on his subjects. Orizio is always to the point, doesn't lose his way, and so the book is brief but every word is worthy (by the way, my congratulations to the translator: if the English edition is a literary accomplishment, I think that the translator has a part of the merit).
You get several lessons from reading this book. The dictators share several characteristics: they lie to you and lie to themselves ("the country I ruled was happier in my times"), they do not face their guilt ("I am innocent" or, in the best case, "if I am guilty, then so is a whole generation; anyone in my position would have done the same"), they find excuses (better a polish dictatorship than a russian one -Jaruzelski); they are fanatics; and, even in their disgrace, they have enjoyed a more or less comfortable economic situation.
But their most important trait -in all of them, especially in the worst types: Amin, Bokassa, Mengistu- is their lack of empathy with the rest of human beings: they were, and, even worse, they still are utterly indifferent to the sufferings of other people. A person is an object to them, not a subject.
So the final conclusion is about the banality of evil: evil is easy to dispense. You have to be a great man to do a great good; but even an imbecile can do a great evil.

Rating:
Summary: Good but Light Read
Review: This book is based on a great concept. Throughout recent history, there have been notorious dictators who, though years ago, dominated our headlines while now are merely footnotes in history books. Riccardo Orizio decides to find seven of these dictators ,interview them, find out what they have been up to, and what they feel about there reign.

Each dictator takes a chapter, and the readers learns about their past, their feelings, and their own view of themselves, which proves extremely fascinating. In each chapter, Riccardo details his ordeals on reaching these fallen dictators, a short history of what they did, and what they are currently up to. Riccardo does a great job of simultaneously making fun of and humanizing these individuals. He also provides insight into there current lives, from Idi Amin's sons, one of whom played basketball in Boston College, the other being a military terrorist being help by Idi himself, to Slobadon Milosevic's wife, who plays the role of a tortured, loyal wife.

I think the main problem of this book is that it is too addictive. It's a short book, so while I intended to have this book last me a week, I couldn't put in down. I bought at noon, and I finished before dinner. One complaint might be that the interviews and background information are not thorough. While true, I think that by leaving out the text book information, he was able to immerse the reader with the dictator's lives and provide great fluidity.

All in all, it's a great idea that proves too addictive to put down.

Rating:
Summary: Deceptive packaging
Review: This book is not as represented. Ninety percent of it is historical detail you can get from other sources, fluffed into thin, uninteresting interviews, some of which hardly merit the term. Combine this with a flat-footed, self-conscious, second-rate translation, and it's an agonizing read, filled even with annoying sentence fragments. Like this. The publisher clearly told Orizio to fill in the empty parts so they could have a book to sell. Don't waste your time. Read TIME instead; it's much more compelling.

Rating:
Summary: Deceptive packaging
Review: This book is not as represented. Ninety percent of it is historical detail you can get from other sources, fluffed into thin, uninteresting interviews, some of which hardly merit the term. Combine this with a flat-footed, self-conscious, second-rate translation, and it's an agonizing read, filled even with annoying sentence fragments. Like this. The publisher clearly told Orizio to fill in the empty parts so they could have a book to sell. Don't waste your time. Read TIME instead; it's much more compelling.

Rating:
Summary: Where are they now?
Review: This work although described as encounters with seven dictators, does not actually involve any detailed encounters as such,but all the preceding events that led to the authors encounter with the dictator in question. The encouners with Amin and Bokkasa are an example of this where 14 out of the 18 pages describe the authors attempt in locating these individuals where there are lengthy descriptions of taxi rides in Jeddah or a trek in the Central African Rep. There are however some good sections such as the part on Mengistu which actually involves an interview with the man. Overall this work was a bit of a let down and does not at all deliver on the sales blurb.

Rating:
Summary: Where Are They Now?
Review: Those seeking detailed biographies of the dictators Italian journalist Orizio tracks down, or penetrating histories and analyses of the years of their respective rule should turn elsewhere, as this is not the book for them. Instead, this is an oddly compelling mix of investigatory reportage and "Where Are They Now?" for readers with an interest in international events. Anyone looking for rigor and meticulous detail will not be pleased with the short chapters such as those on Idi Amin or Bokassa, in which Orizio spends more time recounting his efforts to find his quarry than actually talking to them. This is not necessarily a bad thing though, for the sad truth of the book is that these dictators may have come from a range of cultural and economic backgrounds, but they all end up saying the same thing.

In his preface, Orizio writes that "I deliberately chose those who had fallen from power in disgrace, because those who fall on their feet tend not to examine their own conscience." However, the cliché of the banality of evil fulfills itself, as every single interviewee has the same lies, excuses, and delusions as the others (except for Bokassa, who insists the Pope secretly proclaimed him the 13th Apostle). Unrepentence is rife, as the interviewees trot out the same old chestnuts:"history will vindicate me", "the crimes I'm accused of are all lies perpetrated by my enemies", "my country was better off under me, " "I love my people/country." Clearly none of them have any interest in or incentive for honest examination of their rule, indeed, at this point belief in their own mythology is probably an ingrained psychological self-defense mechanism.

Orizio does present a brief sketch of each dictator's country, and of the history of their rule. We find that hand in hand with the psychological similarity is a methodological similarity in rule. Rise to power based on ideology (or voodoo in the case of Baby Doc), consolidation of power via construction of cult of personality enforced by secret police, leading to corruption, cronyism, and systematic transfer of national wealth to Swiss bank accounts. The odd man out in all this is General Jaruzelski, who instituted martial law in Poland in 1981, and whose hands are vastly less bloody than those of the six others in the book. Indeed, one is almost tempted into feeling sorry for him, lumped in with the half-dozen Marxists, Maoists, Ultranationalists, and nut cases who ruined their countries. The book is an excellent introduction to some creepy, and yes, evil, figures from the recent past. Mengistu, for example, is completely forgotten in the U.S., and the distinctly creepy Hoxha couple of Albania are totally unknown.