Home :: Books :: Home & Garden  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden

Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
Construction Failure, 2nd Edition

Construction Failure, 2nd Edition

List Price: $150.00
Your Price: $137.89
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: "Construction Failure: Government created?" by RexCurry.net
Review: "Construction Failure," 2nd Edition by Jacob Feld is a great book. The part about the Lacey V. Murrow bridge was especially enjoyable. In November of 1990, approximately 850 m (2,800 ft) of the 2020 m (6,620 ft) long LVMB, a 50-year-old floating concrete bridge over Lake Washington near Seattle, Washington, sank. It had been undergoing hydrodemolition for resurfacing which used water to remove asphalt to be replaced.

The bridge sank because environmentalists would not allow the discharge water from the hydrodemolition to drain into the lake, as exposed by the journalist Rex Curry. Consequently, in order to "protect the environment," the discharge water had to be stored in the very concrete pontoons of the bridge. That coupled with a storm and further water leakage led to the collapse of the bridge.

So, the "contaminated" water went into the lake -after the bridge collapsed. The contaminated water was joined by 8 of the bridge's 25 concrete pontoons, road construction material, asphalt, and lots of other debris.

It is unfortunate that this book is like most treatments of the subject in failing to even think about whether dumping the discharge into the Lake would have been a problem after all. It does note that a future project on another nearby bridge used planing technology instead of hydrodemolition for a similar project. Again, no discussion of the comparative "environmental" impact of the later technique.


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates