Rating: 
Summary: B minus
Review: Infinite Jest is an occasionally really good book and A Supposedly Fun Thing has two very great pieces and one story in Hideous Men (Forever Overhead) is just simply a little miracle. I haven't read this book so this review is obviously pretty unfair but I've read two stories from it over the years, Mr. Squishy and the one with the long title about the classroom incident and both of them, in addition to being so long that it's probably like reading half the book, are really tedious and go nowhere. The classroom story in particular is a such a huge letdown after all this boring build-up. Wallace is a divisive figure on the lit scene and I seem to be one of the few people in the middle. Meaning I read Infinite Jest and was really into a lot of it and thought a lot of it was a slog and in the end it gets a B minus. And to me that's what his whole career is all about, some very great stuff which you've really got to give it up for and then just a lot of onanistic (one of his favorite words) typing, so at the end of the day, despite his crazy talent and brains and love of complex math, he ends up being just right there in the yawning middle like Candace Bushnell or something.
Rating: 
Summary: Wallace writes; you decide
Review: It's pretty tough for a writer to balkanize popular opinion the way David Foster Wallace has. It seems that for everyone who views Wallace as a literary genius, there's someone else who thinks he's a self-indulgent bore who appeals only to the pretentious. In truth, Wallace is neither; he's just a writer who takes chances with his work and is apparently willing to accept the occasional failure along with his successes. More a journey than a destination, Wallace's fiction relies heavily on such devices as unconventional narrative structures, punishingly dense and convoluted prose, dazzling verbal trickery, and clinical attention to detail. All that aside, though, Wallace isn't just a showoff, as there's an unmistakable human element to his fiction. Buried among the endless detail of these stories are some moments of profound insight and sympathy for the characters he's created to go with Wallace's innovative style and encyclopedic knowledge of just about everything.
A prime example of all things Wallace is this collection's opening story, "Mr. Squishy," which is about 65 pages long but reads like at least 100. In one respect, this story is an insider's view of the ad industry, complete with descriptions of various market research strategies and examinations of the minutest details of a focus group assembled to test out a new snack cake. On another level, though, the story examines the professional and personal frustrations of its protagonist, a focus-group coordinator who could be a symbol for any number of inconsequential white-collar workers the world over. And of course, there's some trademark Wallace weirdness in the form of a costumed wall-climber with some bad intentions and a highly ambiguous ending that resolves exactly nothing. In other words, it's kind of like a miniature version of "Infinite Jest."
The next story, "The Soul is Not a Smithy," continues in this vein, starting with an elementary school student's daydreams while a substitute teacher descends into madness in front of his class before connecting them to the disappointments of his father's middle-class existence. The brilliant "Another Pioneer" is an examination of the nature of knowledge and belief revolving around the story of a long-ago young genius whose intellectual development eventually became too much for his fellow villagers to handle. The title story takes the arguments between a middle-aged guy and his wife over her accusations of his snoring and turns it into a penetrating look at the complexities that result from the confluence of marriage, parenthood, and aging.
Wallace apparently decided to save the best for last, though, as the 90-page closer "The Suffering Channel" easily ranks among his most fascinating work. At turns poignant, hilarious, bizarre, and profound, the story takes a look at office politics, small-town dreams, and the modern literary world, all centered around a handyman who can create sculptures in a literally incredible manner. It's everything Wallace can be when he's on, and why readers should be willing to tolerate his occasional overreaching. Those who don't like what Wallace does can say what they will, but his successes are more brilliant than most precisely because he aims so high that he doesn't always reach his mark. You can't have Wallace's brilliance without his shortcomings. To be perfectly, honest, you have to just read the man's work and come to your own conclusions.
Rating: 
Summary: Reminds me of Kawabata via Pynchon...
Review: Some of these stories are a hit, e.g. Mister Squishy, The Sould is Not a Smithy, Another Pioneer. Some are a miss, e.g. Incarnations of Burned Children. Either way, the prose is amazing but requires a lot of concentration on the reader's part. The pleasure in Wallace is wrestling with his use of English. It is amazing at times, and, at others, remarkably self-indulgent. I was struck repeatedly by how often I thought of Yasunari Kawabata's work reading Wallace. I thought Wallace's stories were reminiscent of much early-20th century Japanese fiction. Palm-of-the-Hand Stories by Yasunari Kawabata would make an interesting read again after Wallace. Wallace isn't quite as romantic but I think they are doing the same thing. What's important is not what's said but what isn't.
Rating:
Summary: Calm down, people
Review: There are some writers who it becomes fashionable to read and then, when they become too popular or widely praised, fashionable to put down. We are in the midst of the recoil that began after Infinite Jest became popular. I think the recoil is probably going to continue (and appears to be continuing in these reviews) because Wallace is a writer whose flaws are so easy to spot, and it's simple to quote sections of his writing and hold them up as everything that's wrong with today's literary writing. His style is frequently bloated and self-indulgent, and if you're not paying attention it's easy to get lost and call all of it nonsense. Sometimes he tries as hard as he can to make you stop paying attention, when he throws in what appear to be irrelevancies or whatever oddity he can come up with to be more original - because god forbid that any of his writing have the taint of old-fashioned conservative storytelling.This is, unfortunately, only half the truth, because there really are magical moments in Wallace's writing, and just when you're about to get absolutely fed up with him he pulls out something beautiful, or shocking, that for whatever reason stays with you. Even in a two page story like "Incarnations of Burned Children" I went through all of the probable reactions to the stories in this volume: initial interest, confusion with the prose style, impatience, boredom, and then suddenly a moment where the story seems to open up and become incredibly moving. The story is about a mother accidentally scalding her toddler, and is told in the long clause-filled breathless sentences that Wallace uses - with occasional good taste. At first, the prose is frustrating, because it seems to be getting in the way of actually enjoying the story, but eventually it falls into a certain rhythm, and as the parents are frantically trying to cool down their child it starts to imitate their panic, until both the parents and reader realize with horror that the hot water inside the diaper is still burning the child, and despite knowing nothing about this family, in just this little story we can start to understand what it's like to feel terrified for a child that is ours. When a writer enjoys goofing around, and seems to be scared of clarity, it's occasionally hard to judge his genuine value. Reading an early novel of Beckett's, with its incessant clowning around and self-conscious erudition, I wasn't really sure what the big deal was about him - he just seemed like an aggravatingly precocious little kid. But there were glimmers of a profound talent there. And I think there are here too. Instead of complaining about the obvious surface clutter - which, who knows, might be inextricably linked to the virtues, although I hope not - I'm pleased enough with what he can give us.
Rating:
Summary: If You Like DFW, You'll Like This; If Not, You Won't
Review: This is not DFW's best work in my opinion but it's still excellent. I particularly liked the story "Good Old Neon." The first story of the collection "Mr Squishy" was boring and overcooked to me and the worst of what makes DFW's writing so distinctive. I was afraid I wouldn't enjoy the collection, but I'm glad I persisted, because I've liked all the subsequent stories a lot.
As I say in the headline, I think if you like DFW's style, you'll enjoy this. It's very much "him" and in no way a departure. There are less footnotes, but the parenthetical type lengthy digressions are still there along with his slavish devotion to grammatical sentences, the sort of errant pedantry up with which most writers will not put. But for him, I've always found it charming. He has the intelligence and talent to make it work. But if you've read his other works and found this sort of thing tedious, you'll surely not enjoy this one either.
|
