<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Where was her editor?
Review: First let me say that I am a huge fan of Martha Grimes--both the Richard Jury mysteries and her other novels. I love the characters she has constructed in the Jury series. But this was just plain awful. The writing style could almost be described as meandering and disjointed--not good in a mystery with a complicated plot. There are passages that I have read over and over again, and about the meaning of which I still remain confused. I agree with other reviewers that while certain elements of the story --investments, horse racing, premarin production, etc.--were intriguing, they involved too many events that defied credibility. I also found it disturbing and incredible that every male in this novel seemed to be obsessed, sexually, with a seventeen year old female. All but one of these male characters was old enough to be her father or grandfather. It almost seems as if this was a first draft that needed re-working and polishing. Disappointing!
Rating:
Summary: Not Her Best Work
Review: I've only read four of the Richard Jury series (Old Silent, Load of Mischief, Stargazey, and this). I have to agree with several reviewers that this is not up to her usual level, although hardly the worst detective novel I've ever read. The scenes with Aunt Agatha and the hermit were highly amusing.One correction to another review - it was pretty clear to me that Hadrian's Wall was a nickname in the book, not the real wall. But this is not recommended as one's first Martha Grimes novel.
Rating:
Summary: Grimes on a Downward Spiral
Review: I've read all the Richard Jury novels. The last two have been awful...meandering plots, weak endings, characters who have little credibility. I agree. It's time to bury Ruchard Jury.
<< 1 >>
| 
