<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Love The WW III Series
Review: The reviews on the book cover say it all. He is better than Clancy! I love the characters, especially COL Freeman.
Rating: 
Summary: Slater's World War Three series is terrible
Review: The second book in the WWIII series is a disappointment. Not only are there many miliatary inaccuracies but the whole plot is unrealistic. He says that there were thousands of T-90's with thousands of artillery guns ready to Crush the small NATO pocket. And general Freeman(Superman) comes along and leads the counter attack with 1/10 of the number of equipment as the russians and eventually reaches Moscow! Gimmie a break Ian! Your first book was much better. Try working on the realism.
Rating:
Summary: no clancy but a fun read
Review: this book was a good book but remember slater is no clancy
Rating: 
Summary: Better than the first but still trash.
Review: this series could have been interesting. But they just do not live up to expectation. The characters are so boring that it is mind numbing. The plot jumps around which is fine, but fails to really make any sense. Much of what happens is predictable and lacking. the series has many military mistakes which is unforgivable. Read what he used to do as a profession. I thought i'd give the second one a go. but it really is just not a good series. Read Larry bond or tom Clancy for good stories in the techno thriller genre.
Rating:
Summary: Better than the first but still trash.
Review: this series could have been interesting. But they just do not live up to expectation. The characters are so boring that it is mind numbing. The plot jumps around which is fine, but fails to really make any sense. Much of what happens is predictable and lacking. the series has many military mistakes which is unforgivable. Read what he used to do as a profession. I thought i'd give the second one a go. but it really is just not a good series. Read Larry bond or tom Clancy for good stories in the techno thriller genre.
<< 1 >>
| 
