The Angle Quickest for Flight

Rating:
Summary: If Borges wrote the screenplay for Mission Impossible...
Review: ...it might look something like this novel. I can't think of higher praise, actually, for a book of this type: a brisk, engaging, I-can't-put-this-down type of read coupled with some serious metaphysical chops. The ragged crew of protagonists are all extremely intriguing as character studies as they go galavanting around the globe looking for spiritual enlightenment. The fact that they are a little bit mercenary (especially the rakish Coyote Blu) only adds to the charm of the novel (even when it's a very VIOLENT charm, I might add). In some ways this reminded me of Eco's fine novels, or even Pavic's Dictionary of the Khazars, but what Kotler brings to the table is a cinematic style of prose. It might seem off-putting and glib at first, but give it a chance, it tends to grow on you (yes, the characters quip a lot, but there are some one line zingers as well). The only flaw I could find in the book is that the characters smoke and drink (alcohol and coffee) all the time; not that I'm against that, mind you, but sometimes I felt that the author was using that as a prop when he didn't know what his character wanted to do in terms of body language. Other than that, though, this book is a crazy textual labyrinth, milking to the fullest the delights of both weird metaphysics AND a taut, Steve McQueen-esque thriller.

Rating:
Summary: If Borges wrote the screenplay for Mission Impossible...
Review: ...it might look something like this novel. I can't think of higher praise, actually, for a book of this type: a brisk, engaging, I-can't-put-this-down type of read coupled with some serious metaphysical chops. The ragged crew of protagonists are all extremely intriguing as character studies as they go galavanting around the globe looking for spiritual enlightenment. The fact that they are a little bit mercenary (especially the rakish Coyote Blu) only adds to the charm of the novel (even when it's a very VIOLENT charm, I might add). In some ways this reminded me of Eco's fine novels, or even Pavic's Dictionary of the Khazars, but what Kotler brings to the table is a cinematic style of prose. It might seem off-putting and glib at first, but give it a chance, it tends to grow on you (yes, the characters quip a lot, but there are some one line zingers as well). The only flaw I could find in the book is that the characters smoke and drink (alcohol and coffee) all the time; not that I'm against that, mind you, but sometimes I felt that the author was using that as a prop when he didn't know what his character wanted to do in terms of body language. Other than that, though, this book is a crazy textual labyrinth, milking to the fullest the delights of both weird metaphysics AND a taut, Steve McQueen-esque thriller.

Rating:
Summary: Half finished - Into the recycle bin
Review: An enigma of a book. In one chapter a central charater meets Jesus in some of the best writing I have read in years. In further chapters we get 'witty and cool' writing like this:
At nine o'clock Coyote comes down the street, a perfect blue suit, 1940's juke joint elegance. Fantastic hat. No dust on his shoes. Under his left arm is a square box, black satin with a small brass hasp.
"Gab-ri-al," dragging the name out
"Coyote Blu"
Coyote sets the box at his feet, they use all four palms to press palms.
Gag me. I guess I'm just not that cool. This book has sat on my bed stand for weeks and even with its large print and double spacing I still can't finish it. I'm a Zen Bhuddist who often consults the I Ching and still I'm tossing this book.

Rating:
Summary: Half finished - Into the recycle bin
Review: An enigma of a book. In one chapter a central charater meets Jesus in some of the best writing I have read in years. In further chapters we get 'witty and cool' writing like this:
At nine o'clock Coyote comes down the street, a perfect blue suit, 1940's juke joint elegance. Fantastic hat. No dust on his shoes. Under his left arm is a square box, black satin with a small brass hasp.
"Gab-ri-al," dragging the name out
"Coyote Blu"
Coyote sets the box at his feet, they use all four palms to press palms.
Gag me. I guess I'm just not that cool. This book has sat on my bed stand for weeks and even with its large print and double spacing I still can't finish it. I'm a Zen Bhuddist who often consults the I Ching and still I'm tossing this book.

Rating:
Summary: Pseudo-mystical Nightmarescape.
Review: As I was reading this, I thought, "Hmm. I wonder if any secret messages are encrypted in this text." Well, turns out, probably not. But, what the hey, it's entertainment. Take the oldest surviving institution in Western Civilization (the Catholic church) steeped in mystery and exam its "secret archives", and there's bound to be some bad mojo going on. Throw in gratuitously references to the Kabbalah, theoretical physics, and transfinite set theory (dumbed down to the level Hollywood understands, i.e. "isn't it cool it's infinity bigger'n infinity"), some deranged priests, the Jesuits, a drifter, and the Rastafareans, and this is what you get. It's not bad for a cheapo adventure tale, but let's not get carried away here.

Rating:
Summary: Many pleasures
Review: The Angle Quickest for Flight offers many pleasures. In its feeling of mystery and poetry, it reminded me of Nicholas Christopher's novel, Veronica. If it is ultimately less sublime than that wonderful book, it is nevertheless well worth reading for anyone inclined toward esoteric mysteries and adventures. I did notice an alarming number of typographic and proof-reading errors in the book, but then it occurred to me that probably if one carefully attends to the page and line numbers where these "errors" occur, the secret of the 65th hexagram of the I Ching is probably revealed.

Rating:
Summary: "Artsy" and intriquing--but rather scattered and confusing..
Review: This highly-stylized novel has some good qualities and is generally enjoyable. The plot is fast-paced and interesting. But it was one of those books where you put it down when you are done and hardly think of it again. I found no depth or meaning. I could never figure out why the author wanted to tell me this story. The theory seemed to be that if he used the word "Angle" near the beginning of every chapter, a meaning would suddenly pop into place. But great art doesn't need to bludgeon you about the head to convey its meaning. In this case, even with the bludgeoning, I still don't get the point.

Nor could I ever figure why the characters were doing any of the things they were doing. Characterization in general is severely lacking. The male protaganists are made of cardboard: I couldn't tell them apart at all.

For Eco fans (and I encourage everyone to become one) this book is like 'Focault's Pendulum Jr. Edition'. Same premise but without the passion. I think the writer has talent for telling a story, but I hope next time he finds one with a voice that is not only hip but also powerful.

Rating:
Summary: A good plot somewhat muddied by "other stuff"
Review: This novel has a lot going for it. It has a strong plot - the discovery and theft of an ancient book from the secret archives of the Vatican. It has interesting and varied characters. Kotler's use of language is skilful and effective. It's the kind of book I expected to enjoy.

But I really didn't, for a number of reasons. The plot, while interesting, was constantly interrupted by chapters about the characters' pasts, or chapters containing little plot digressions that went nowhere, or chapters where the characters describe ideas that are interesting but not really relevant. Those chapters that advance the story itself were very compressed, so that the story would suddenly lurch forward toward the next problem or resolution.

Now, I don't mind a novel that has digressions, or fills in some backstory, where doing so adds richness to the plot, or where we learn more about the characters. But somehow, in this novel, this "other stuff" just seemed to get in the way, to muddy the plot.

I was also disappointed the dialogue. All the characters spoke in the same clipped, sentence-without-a-subject style, even though they were supposed to be different ages, to have come from different countries, and to have experienced very different lives. Furthermore, although having quite different philosophies, the characters never argued; instead, they seemed impossibly accepting of each others ideas.

If you like a book written in an interesting style, with snappy dialogue and a variety of ideas, then this book may be for you. For myself, I prefer books with a little more structure, a little more character development, and a plot with more focus.

Rating:
Summary: A most interesting, challenging and engaging read
Review: While the story had some intriguingly trippy elements, it was probably the worst job of editing I've ever seen in a commercially produced book, with dozens of distracting typos, misspellings and grammatical errors. Worse was the meandering narrative that I kept reading in vain hope of finding some meaning.