Ruling the World

Rating:
Summary: Self-indulgent
Review: Even reading the first 6 pages of this book using Amazon's "see inside this book" facility will reveal that the writing is extremely repetitive. The same material could have been presented in a maximum of 2 pages by a writer concerned with informing a wider audience, rather than one concerned with impressing his peers and himself.

Rating:
Summary: Self-indulgent
Review: Even reading the first 6 pages of this book using Amazon's "see inside this book" facility will reveal that the writing is extremely repetitive. The same material could have been presented in a maximum of 2 pages by a writer concerned with informing a wider audience, rather than one concerned with impressing his peers and himself.

Rating:
Summary: Self -indulgent
Review: Only reading the first 6 pages available on Amazon's "see inside this book" facility will reveal that this book is incredibly repetitive. The same material could have been presented in a maximum of 2 pages by a writer concerned with informing a wider audience, rather than one concerned with impressing peers, and himself.

Rating:
Summary: Self -indulgent
Review: Only reading the first 6 pages available on Amazon's "see inside this book" facility will reveal that this book is incredibly repetitive. The same material could have been presented in a maximum of 2 pages by a writer concerned with informing a wider audience, rather than one concerned with impressing peers, and himself.

Rating:
Summary: Utter Confusion
Review: Ruling the World is at least as difficult to read as any book I have ever opened. The sentences are horribly convoluted and obtuse. The ideas presented, whatever their merit, are lost in a sea of extraneous parenthetical phrases that do nothing but obscure the message. Which may be just as well. The proposals bristle with arrogance and should never have been articulated in the first person.

Rating:
Summary: Utter Confusion
Review: Ruling the World is at least as difficult to read as any book I have ever opened. The sentences are horribly convoluted and obtuse. The ideas presented, whatever their merit, are lost in a sea of extraneous parenthetical phrases that do nothing but obscure the message. Which may be just as well. The proposals bristle with arrogance and should never have been articulated in the first person.