Democracy in America

Rating:
Summary: A whole course on political science
Review: It has been said that this is the best book about the US and the best book about democracy. Having just read it, I can say it is even more. Tocqueville reflects not only on the US or on democracy, but his comparative approach sheds light on the Europe of his times and before, on the nature of aristocracy and the inevitable democratic revolution which was on its way across the civilized world. Tocqueville was a realistic aristocrat, sometimes nostalgic for the "greatness" of yesterday, but bearing no illusions whatsoever about the feasibility of stopping democratic change. So, he sets to find out what is it about democracy that can work, and what its inherent risks are. And he decides to tour the grandest democratic experiment ever attempted by Man: the United States.

What Tocqueville finds is a unique nation. Unlike most other nascent states in history, the English who moved to America found a huge land, practically devoid of people (and in those cases where it was inhabited, they were easily killed), where everybody could be a landowner. This, plus the particular ethics of the Puritans, the glorifiaction of hard work, thrift and virtuosity, provided for a prosperous, practical people (not necessarily tolerant, especially in religious affairs). Far away from kings and emperors, Americans developed a communal democracy. So far so good, Tocquevill really admires the basic qualities of the US.

But this book is not a long eulogy of democracy. Tocqueville admits democracy is the best way to govern a modern society, but that does not mean he thinks it's perfect or endlessly beneficial. Democracy DOES poses risks: among others, the tyranny of the majority, the mediocrity towards which it impels mores; the loneliness of the individual, lost amidst an endless, faceless crowd.

Even for some minor mistaken attempts at prophecy, Tocqueville's prescience adn long-term vision is simply astonishing. He was right about the merits of democracy; he was right about its shortcomings. If he would come to the present-day US, he would probably find much to celebrate (prosperity, technological progress, widespread access to education, health, etc), and much to deplore, precisely the mediocrity of democratic tastes (think music, literature, cinema, art. etc).

Tocqueville's culture and knowledge are impressive, even more so considering how young he was when he travelled in the US. His style is conversational and straightforward, assertive but modest. The reader will find here a whole lot of wisdom and subjects to think about and it is simply one of the best books on politics and society ever written, one that is relevant todat as it was many years ago.

Rating:
Summary: One those books that must be read..............
Review: Push yourself through the first couple of chapters where de Tocqueville discusses the formation of townships and counties and then find yourself in the lap of an oracle as he confidently and correctly identifies the stengths and weaknesses of America's democratic future. This book, written in 1832, resulted from de Tocqueville's tour of America and his wizardry of forecasting America's political milieu for generations to come is astonishing. Observing our fledgling political process, he extrapolates in detail what you and I live today as he extrapolated what our ancestors have lived before us. One cannot consider themselves an informed observer of American politics without recourse to this masterpiece. A must read for everyone in search of socio-political erudition.

Rating:
Summary: Keep Aware
Review: The reader must constantly keep in mind that AT is writing and appealing primarily to French readers and readers in France who are accustomed to different mentalities than the Americans. This is why AT's Democracy in America is, at times, difficult to understand and appreciate for an American reader who is accustomed especially to democracy and nothing else. AT's writing is concise and at times too incisive and oversimplified for the reader who is not of the times and not French. I believe a French reader is more inclined to appreciate DIA than those whose tastes of political society have not been extended outside the sphere of American democracy.