Nature as Subject

Rating:
Summary: Undoubtedly worth the read.
Review: An excellent intro to the field of environmental ethics, this book was certainly clearer than others of its ilk that I've attempted before. Katz's arguments leave few loose ends. Reading along, my thoughts would leap ahead to "But what about...?" or "Yes, but what you're saying implies...!", only to find those particular point(s) tied up by the end of the essay.

There's no piece here too lengthy to read in one sitting, and no obscure jargon or vague arguments. Be warned, however: this book is more theoretical than applied ethics, and I was initially disappointed by this fact. But despite this, and despite the fact that you may disagree with the arguments used or conclusions reached by the author, the food-for-thought offered herein makes "Nature as Subject" well worth reading.

Rating:
Summary: Excellent overview and introduction to environmental ethics.
Review: Eric Katz is one of the founders of the field of environmental ethics. This excellent collection of his papers does a great job of introducing readers to the core themes and concepts in the field. Katz's particular contributions to the debates in environmental ethics are especially compelling. Even if you disagree with some of his views on specific topics (the morality of hunting, the idea of an ecosystem as a community, the merits of attempting to restore nature) you'll enjoy the stimulation of engaging with the author on these issues. Also, unlike many contemporary philosophers and theorists, Katz's writing is admirably clear and often enjoyable to read. The last two sections include some of the few papers yet written on Judaism and the environment, which alone justify getting a copy of this stimulating book.

Rating:
Summary: Philosophical View Points are not Affirmative
Review: This book is divided into 4 themes. Each theme is comprised of essays written by Eric Katz, beginning as early as the 1970's. Due to the fact that this author is a Philosopher makes this book a slow reader. His view points do not reflect what can actually be done to help the planet, but reflects more on the "how to" instill environmental ethics. So, while this author is writing a book that may or may not revamp the whole idea of environmental conservation, forests are being logged and wildlife species are becoming extinct.

If you are a philosophy major the ideology uncovered in this book may stimulate you, but if not then just skip to the middle. The books second and third theme are better to read, but not the best reading I have done on the subject.