Arts & Photography 
Audio CDs 
Audiocassettes 
Biographies & Memoirs 
Business & Investing 
Children's Books 
Christianity 
Comics & Graphic Novels 
Computers & Internet 
Cooking, Food & Wine 
Entertainment 
Gay & Lesbian 
Health, Mind & Body 
History 
Home & Garden 
Horror 
Literature & Fiction 
Mystery & Thrillers 
Nonfiction 
Outdoors & Nature 
Parenting & Families 
Professional & Technical 
Reference 
Religion & Spirituality 
Romance 
Science 
Science Fiction & Fantasy 
Sports 
Teens 
Travel 
Women's Fiction 
           | 
    
    
    
      
  | 
Fathers' Rights: Hard-Hitting & Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute |  
List Price: $16.00 
Your Price: $10.88 | 
  | 
 
  |  
| 
 |  
| Product Info | 
Reviews | 
 
  
Rating:   Summary: Father's Rights is right Review: This will be short and simple. The book offers great advice. My son can only pray this helpful informaiton will help him in his custody battle. I recommend this book to all fathers seeking their rights and to the Judges who make those decisions about the father's getting their rights!
  Rating:   Summary: Court Is Not Where We Want To End Up Review: We have watched others follow this advice and then with all their good efforts still lose. We need more input into the process. Finding and trusting a good attorney just isn't enough. We are going to keep looking.
  Rating:   Summary: Disagree that women don't deserve half of marital assets Review: While the advice to fathers was very good (I read it because my brother is going through a divorce and custody battle and I empathize with him), I disagree with the author in that I believe a marriage is a 50-50 contract. If a husband breaks that contract and has been married many years, the woman deserves 50% of any assets that man ever receives from his sucessess as a business man. My wife put her own career secondary to mine the day we married. She helped me rise to my current status and, if I were to break my marriage vows, I would feel she deserved 1/2 of our assets and 1/2 of my future earnings because she helped me get to where I am today in my career. I don't think she thought of me as a "meal ticket" when she married me 34 years ago. We thought we were MARRIED. i.e. "all for one and one for all" in our relationship. Marriage is a contract and we worked it out together how we would proceed with our life together. I think Mr. Leving has the wrong perspective on marriage to begin with. If a wife breaks her marriage vows and earns the higher income, the husband should still receive half of the assets and half HER future earnings.
 
 
  
 |  
  |   
     |   
     |