Rating: 
Summary: A Little Disappointing
Review: I had Old Souls given to me at Christmas by my loving, although skeptical sister. I'm sure she must have read the book before wrapping it, but was kind enough to defer a review before I had read it.
I am a Buddhist, although a Irish-American by birth. I always hope this orientation has not distorted my critical eye, since I am also trained as a science teacher.
I found the book disappointing because it read more like a travellog , than a book about the possibilities of children and any mortals of recalling past lives which actually have been lived. I also have lately had trouble with reconciling any consciousness after biological death with what we know about the brain and its obvious mortality. We can all pity the plight of the brain damaged and elderly.
That said, I honestly now I neither convinced or entirely dissauded of the possibility our brief consciousness as a human animal may have a component shared by an eternal God. I know its a comforting idea of poo poo death and now in my middle age and after the death of parents, would wish to believe love and life continue after I die.
I am confronted with something this book touched upon if ever so fleeting. Exactly how would we prove we have lived before? Memory cannot be trusted. Can you remember what you did at age five or even thirteen? Our bodies and minds and perhaps souls are caught in the eternal flux of change, death and regeneration. I am a bit comforted that one of the greatest minds humanity was likewise confronted with this dissonance of metaphysics and hard science, Immanuel Swedenborg.
May I say I was read by a psychic recently and was told more or less the same thing I was told about a past life by another psychic, over fifteen years earlier. Just coincidence?
I advise all who are not acquainted with the work of Dr. Stevenson to read this book, but make it not your last in this intriguing fronteer of human understanding. Its depressing to believe when you're dead, you're DEAD!
Rating: 
Summary: Title should be: Travels with a Reincarnation Researcher
Review: I have been familiar with Stevenson's reincarnation research since the late 60's and early 70's but was frustrated that his works were so far removed from the non-academic public. It was the only "scientific evidence" that I knew of. Even large public libraries didn't carry his books. One of his best books is expensive and I was elated that the library I interlibrary loaned it from was willing to send it. So I was SO EXCITED to see the review of "Old Souls: The Scientific Evidence for Past Lives", and ordered the book for our library (I'm a public librarian). So with the attitude "Finally! Stevenson's scientific evidence for public palate!", I read the book. I was D-I-S-A-P-P-O-I-N-T-E-D ! I was not at all interested in the very detailed descriptions of the hotel dining room and how often the table cloths were changed: "It was a long, narrow room with windows stretching across one side and a blank wall on the other. The tables were covered with freshly ironed white table cloths, which the staff changed after every meal and sometimes in between courses. Waiters in white jackets lurked inconspicuously behind the pillars in the center of the room, always appearing, as if by telepathy, when they were needed." I wish this detail were applied to the cases. The cases got lost and dispersed in the travelogue and other irrelevant detail. The title of the book should have been more accurately, "Travels with a Reincarnation Researcher". But since that was not the title, I am rating this book only two stars, because I felt the title was misleading. Also, in metaphysical circles, the word "old souls" describes spiritually advanced souls who have had many, many lifetimes (hence the term old souls), not just "any soul", as the cases seem to discuss. An example of an "old soul" might have had the character Gandhi had. The other reviewers were right, not much meat in here in so far as the "scientific evidence". Though I understand that Shroder could only write first-hand about the cases that they investigated in those few weeks, like I said, the title was misleading. However the book was not without value. The value is in an appreciation of what Dr. Stevenson has to go through to collect the "scientific evidence" and other data for me to sit in an armchair and read. He has to find remote villages, find the people, and suppose he has to make a long grueling trip out there and they aren't there anymore, or at least not for the day, as not everyone has a phone. I suppose many of his efforts are without fruit. The book also gives glimpses of Dr. Stevenson's personality and it answered what I always wondered: "Where does the money come from to finance his research and pay for his worldwide travels?" I used to think that is why the books (earlier editions or previous publishers) cost so much. But now that I know, I feel "God" provided the way that his research was financed. If one wants true scientific evidence of reincarnation, I recommend "Where Reincarnation and Biology Intersect", by Dr. Stevenson, which is the condensed version of the much longer (and more expensive) title "Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects". I read the latter, which is a medical monograph with extensive documentation, references, numerous tables, and many footnotes. The "Where Reincarnation and Biology Intersect" has none of this. I especially found fascinating, the chapter "Birthmarks Corresponding to Wounds Verified by Medical Records". "Old Souls: Scientific Evidence for Past Lives" would be a better title for "Where Reincarnation and Biology Intersect", than Shroder's book . I like reading case after case after case after case, which books written by Dr. Stevenson provide. He gets to the NITTY -GRITTY! Stevenson also covers his methodology and interview methods. It's just that it's very academic, as a physician would write about a patient in their chart. Some of Stevenson's other titles, which you can interlibrary loan, if not purchase, are: Birthmarks Cases of the Reincarnation Type: Twelve Cases in Thailand & Burma Children Who Remember Previous Lives: a Question of Reincarnation A Handbook on Reincarnation Reincarnation and Biology: a Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects Telepathic Impressions: a Review and Report of Thirty-Five New Cases Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation Unlearned Language: New Studies on Xenoglossy Xenoglossy: a Review and Report of a Case
Rating: 
Summary: The individual cases discussed are not worth a book.
Review: I have read a fair sampling of books about reincarnation, so I suppose I had high expectations when I purchased this book. I have no argument with the author's interpretations/opinions re: past research, and what it all may mean, etc. My disappointment stems from the fact that the cases he discusses are simply rather boring examples of the phenomena. Although he was limited to those cases which he could not hand pick that were under investigation during the trips to Lebanon and India, he could have at least included some reference, anecdotal or not, to some more compelling cases that would make the book more worthwhile reading. It was a letdown.
Rating: 
Summary: Old Souls-A Must Read for Skeptics
Review: I have read many books on reincarnation in recent years and this is the best I've found to help a skeptic see how research is often accompished and how much evidence exists. The author very fairly reports Dr Stevenson's efforts and then let's the reader decide what it means. If this book doesn't whet your appetite, nothing will.
Rating:
Summary: "Old Souls" proves to be a heroic adventure
Review: I recommend this book to anyone who is interested in adventure stories. A man sets out against incredible odds, traveling through perilous lands and braving endless tests of faith to deliver Truth to the masses. Is reincarnation a reality? No one can prove it, not definitively. But no one seems to be looking for concrete proof either way. With the exception of Dr. Ian Stevenson and a small handful of other researchers he has inspired to believe in his work. "Old Souls" is a fascinating portrait of one of the last true heroes: the scientist. Dr. Stevenson has dedicated his life to investigating children's claims of past-life memories, claims the majority of modern science has turned it's back on. The book, filled with descriptions so vivid you feel as if you can smell, taste and touch the surroundings, takes the reader on a colorful journey to Beirut, India and Middle America. We are following the 79 year-old scientist on what may be his last interviews with the families, past and present, of the children who have memories of another life. These spontaneous memories are not the grand, theatrical "I was Cleopatra"-type claims that have become old hat in New Age philosophy. They are not a product of regression-hypnosis. The past life memories in Stevenson's research are simple, plain and out of the mouths of babes--often with enough details and names to identify the adress and family of the person they claim to have been. In almost all of the cases covered in the book, the families of the past personality support the cliams of the child, believing, despite any descrepancies, that they have regained their departed relative. Stevenson has fought to keep his records accurate, copious and, most of all, sane. His research is unquestionably thorough, which you'll find is quite an accomplishment when you read about the daunting odds he is up against--travels all across the globe to conduct interviews with subjects who are sometimes unwilling, often surly and occasionally downright dangerous. "Old Souls" seves as testimony to the doctor's relentless dedication to accuracy. In places that have been too busy trying to survive multiple wars to keep exact records of anything beyond the past month, Stevenson has spent days searching for 20 year-old documents helpful only to verify a small portion of a child's claim. I found the studies conducted to be fascinating and the book to be extraordinary in it's ability to make feild research seem thrilling. Although I was not fully convinced, by the end of the book, that reincarnation was the only explanation for these children's stories, author Tom Shroder did convince me that this research can no longer be ignored. If any part of these cases of past-life awareness, numbering over 3,000 documented cases to date, can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, the implications could be revolutionary. These investigations cannot end with Stevenson's retirement. As I've said, Stevenson, by virtue of his dedicated search for truth outside what our society has deemed possible, seems to be one of the last true heroes. And this book is the story of one of the last true adventures.
Rating:
Summary: A doorway into Dr. Stevenson's work
Review: I've gone through several copies of this book. Everytime it finds a comfy space on my shelf, a friend gets a hold of it and away it goes. Suffice to say, it changes those who read it. Fundamentalist christians and athiests alike find the research of Dr. Stevenson deeply disconcerting and for good reason. When people think of reincarnation evidence it's usually the hypnotic-regression fantasies which share the bed with alien abduction. But Dr. Stevenson's research is as far away from that as you can get. Imagine if your 4 year-old suddenly mentioned that he liked you better than his old parents and told you that he lived on a ranch in New Mexico. You would probably think his imagination was getting the better of him. But if he provided details which you later verified, how would you react? This scenario has indeed occurred in reality and has done so many times as the research of Dr. Stevenson shows. When reading this book remember a few things. Dr. Stevenson has outstanding credentials. He never jumps from point A to point C. If there is no B he admits so. And all of these cases involve deceased persons. No child has reported being someone who is still living or from the future(which weakens psychic ability as being a cause of this phenomena). And lastly, if reincarnation exists, and I believe Dr. Stevenson's research suggests so, what does that say about human consciousness and our place in the universe?
Rating:
Summary: Well-written, but reincarnation not scientifically proveable
Review: If someone told me that a fairly mainstream journalist was going to travel with Dr. Ian Stevenson, the world's leading scientific researcher on reincarnation, to investigate the scientific proof for reincarnation, and what would I expect, "Old Souls" would fit quite well. I would suspect tnat the book would show more humanity than Dr. Stevenson's rather dry accounts of his cases, but most importantly, if a conventional, rational thinking person needs to travel to various countries to find "proof" of reincarnation to convince them, it is unlikely that they would ever be convinced that reincarnation is a fact. "Old Souls" is easy and pleasureable to read, and I agree with tne reviewers who compliment Mr. Shroder on the travelogues of his and Dr. Stevenson's tales in Lebanon and India. He very effectively describes the conditions in the two countries, clearly and honestly, and conveys both the terrible effect that many wars have had on Lebanon, as well as the rather gruesome and awful poverty in India. The author also depicts the drama of meeting people in the flesh who can clearly remember what I believe is a fact, their lives in other bodies. There are several cases in "Old Souls" that I feel would convince anyone with an open mind that reincarnation is true. "Old Souls" in a way is an attempt to vindicate Dr. Stevenson, who comes across as a very noble, persistent, but frustrated scientist, largely ignored by the mainstream scientific community despite thousands of solid cases in many countries which point to reincarnation. And in a way the books succeeds in vindicating Dr. Stevenson. But unfortunately Mr. Shroder himself, typical of people indoctrinated in cultures which reject reincarnation, can never seem to accept it, and his objections are also the same reasons we hear over and over, e.g., since he can't remember past lives, he can't accept it; since science, which he obviously accepts as the arbiter of truth, cannot "prove" reincarnation, it can't be true; and so on. I found this aspect of the book quite tiresome. I must wonder if there can ever be "scientific proof" of reincarnation, the soul, Karma and so on. And I must ask, "Who cares?" I certainly do not, I do not consider scientific materialism the arbiter of ANY truths when it comes to metaphysical questions. So as I understand it, "old souls" like the author's do indeed keep reincarnating until they learn that evolving as souls through multiple human experiences is indeed our true mission. I can't "prove" that either. There are simply some truths that we must come to by non-rational methods and experiences, and it's really sad that rational proof is the only way so many people can decide on the veracity of crucial matters. God is an experience, not an experiment.
Rating:
Summary: Entertaining account of often ignored scientific work
Review: If you are looking for an entertaining version of a phenomenon which has been rarely studied seriously by academicians of Stevenson's calibre, then this is the book for you. While the book does not cover the tremendous lifework of this gifted scientist, it does take an investigative journalist's view of one segment of Stevenson's latest efforts. And yes, if you want a serious and complex read, then you need only turn to Stevenson's recent comprehensive two volume text on reincarnation and biology. But if you want a light introductory version which may leave you scratching your head that there maybe something real here, then this book will serve that purpose. Most impressive, as Shroder points out, is the fact that Stevenson really is objective and unbiased in his approach. Such objectivity should lend credibility to the subject matter and should stimulate a degree of acceptability by this book's reaching a more popular and broader audience. At the very least, perhaps more people will see that reincarnation may be studied in a factual rather than a mystical fashion.
Rating: 
Summary: Too much Lebenon and India, not enough reincarnation.
Review: It seems the author was more interested in telling of the conditions in India and Lebenon than telling the storys of the children's lives and prior lives.
Rating:
Summary: The scientific method - take cover!
Review: More claptrap for the scientifically illiterate. Lots of anecdotes; little actual evidence. When a bunch of stories comprise a valid new theory, let me know, so I can submit the world of Mother Goose. Psuedoscience at its worst. Shroder proves that journalists should stick to journalizing, and should stay away from science unless they actually know a thing or two about the subject.
|
