<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Approaching perfection
Review: Almost 2 years after I bought my Genuine Leather, its still in great shape, and I use it daily, albeit with a case, but I'm impressed at how well its made. I also enjoy the 11pt font, which was a deciding factor for me even though my eyes are fine. I'm generally thrilled with this particular version, NASB Update, but have one complaint. The Bible doesn't give book outlines at the beginning of each book, or even begin a new book on a new page. This is a small nag, but why would a publisher do that?
Rating:
Summary: Approaching perfection
Review: Amazon sometimes merges reviews on various editions. For most books, this is exactly what you'd want. Obviously, the (Christian) Bible is an exception. So for the record, this review is for ISBN 1885217668. I've read the other reviews dated before this one and everything they say applies to this ISBN. I'll try to not to dwell on points already covered by others. NASB: I prefer to go as transliteral as possible. Only seems reasonable if you're going to go to all the trouble of actually reading the Bible. Print: Nice. I wouldn't call it LARGE PRINT but it's comfortable to read. Single column. Nice side column references. Each verse gets a new line but some (well-documented) standards explain what bold numbers, italicized words, letter vs number footnoting, etc all mean. Paper: Acid free, reasonably thick. I don't highlight my Bibles as all that work would be wasted if I decided to switch. I keep a notebook/computer file. This one seems like the highlighting wouldn't bleed through. Some Bibles, it would bleed through many pages, not just to the other side. All three edges are gilded with gold(like) foil. Binding: First class. Good (not great) quality leather. This is not a hardcover. Rather a flexible, leather binding. There is an 82 page concordance and 11 pages of maps in the back. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing them add commentaries on each book prior to its presentation: who, when, what about, etc. This "near-perfect" edition could use some raised spine bands, slightly thicker and more (but not completely) flush-with-the-pages covers, the aforementioned intros/commentaries and a better job with the edge gilding (it may just be my copy but it was a bit thin in places). Thumbs pretty far up.
Rating:
Summary: The Perfect Reference Bible
Review: I didn't think the perfect bible existed till i bought this one. There is not one negative thing i can say.The margins are perfect for note taking.Binding is excellent. Smyth sewn.Paper is perfect for note takeing and print does not bleed through from under side.Margins are not overly large but just right.I've always prefered the NAS. The updated version is even better.Buy this with study helps and your much better off than a study bible that will always fall short.It is a winner.
Rating:
Summary: A Gem!
Review: I have now owned my NASB for a little over a year and I have fallen in love with it.
The margins are wide enough to write notes on. The cross references located on the outside margin are handy, and the paper is heavy enough so that light hi-lighting does not bleed through. My only complaint would be that I wish the paper where just a little heavier. All-n-all though, it's a great Bible and a great translation.
Rating:
Summary: Excellent Bible!
Review: I purchased my first NASB (1971 version) over 20 years ago. Here are some of the things I like about this version: 1. The version itself: This is the new updated version. If you've seen comparisons of the various Bible versions, the NASB generally is described as the most literal version (word-for-word accuracy) of the Bible that sometimes suffers in terms of readability for that very reason. I believe the reputation has been largely undeserved. There were occasional awkward constructions but, all in all, it was quite readable. With this version they have gone back over sentence structure, vocabulary, etc. with a view toward improving the readability and flow of the language. They have also removed archaic words like Thee and Thou. I think they have succeeded in improving readability without compromising the accuracy of the translation. We now have a literal, word-for-word translation that reads with the best of the modern versions. (I initially liked the NIV, but eventually got to the point where I realized that without an accurate word-for-word translation close by, I would never really know what the Bible was saying.) 2. Large print (11 point). It's not outrageously large, just larger than the normal 7-9 point font size that you regularly see. Great if you are over 40 or just like a larger font. 3. Single column layout with side cross-references. I find that a single column allows my eye to track more naturally across the page, similar to reading a book. The side column references are extensive and helpful without crowding the actual text of the Bible. Also, there is ample space for notes in the generous margins. 4. Quality. From the paper to the layout to the typeface to the binding (Smyth-sewn), everything is done with excellence. If you've been disappointed lately with the quality of Bibles, you won't be with this one. One caveat: The leather of this version is not as supple and soft as you may be used to. It's kind of grainy. This, however, does not detract from the overall perception of quality. (BTW, there is a new deluxe version of this edition coming out soon (due 7/15/02) using the finest genuine cowhide and an even higher quality paper.) I am very enthusiastic about this version and the quality of the production of this Bible. Highly recommended!
Rating:
Summary: Top quality Bible
Review: This is how a Bible should be constructed. The leather is top quality, the binding smyth sewn, the printing is large and clear, the size is just right, and it's single column! I changed versions from the NKJV because I just can't stand the junk that Nelson is putting out (Zondervan is even worse!) Bad bindings, poor printing, lousy layout. And it's the same with reference materials; they fall apart with any kind of use. But Foundation is different. If you've ever seen a Cambridge Bible, this is comparable in quality. I really wish the other manufacturers of Bibles would get a clue and start making them like this.
<< 1 >>
| 
