<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: McKierkegaard, Fast & Easy, a good & enjoyable glimpse of SK
Review: "A Possibility" (from Stage's on Lifes Way)
starting on Page 104, I found to be particularly
poignant and impressive among the parables presented.I liked this book and still do. :) Very accessible, and interesting even
apart from the whole of his writing,
therefore more digestable to the average person. The other parable mentioned in another review
as most notable is unseemly to note without
mentioning any other, but that is opinion. "A Possibility" is widely regarded
as profound and noteworthy. :) The introduction well describes the purpose and intent
of this book, and of SK's parables, to the readers. Many short parable presented that are witty or amusing. A few longer ones such as "A Possibility." Not definitive as a representative of his thought or writing
if you are looking for anything like a synopsis or condensed
representation of his authorship/ideas/"philosophy"/thought. Enjoyable light(er) reading than trying to delve
into his actual titles, per se, however. :) Soren Kierkegaard's authorship has always
been not commonly well understood, in part
due to his "unique 'method/mode of authorship'",
but more than that, and is somewhat out of
the range of most readers, unfortunately,
however highly regarded by some of intellect
to comprehend his work properly, he has
been represented foolishly at times,
by those who quote him, as in the old
playboy interview style of photo's
and obscure references to SK, taken by many
in the intelligentsia in the 20th cent.
as the "father" of existentialism,
and fashionable to be seen as one familiar
with im and his work, but also rightly viewed
as being influential upon modern ideas,
his take on things however to those who don't
even know his name would find very similar
to their own, and not just some silly obscure
neurotic rambling as obscure dense complex
literature is usually perceived and represented as. In some ways his authorship could be summed up
in an extremely oversimplified way as an
exhaustive exposition of the term "subjectivity",
which is the term as buzzword often employed
in attempts at explaining or representing his
thought and ideas/"philosophy", which he was not
regarded as contemporaneously as a "philosopher",
but as a writer, actually quite ridiculed in his lifetime,
after his upbringing and training in seminary (churchdom),
to be a pastor himself, and wrote along multi-level
world views at differing times.
His life is almost always presented when discussing him
or his writings. His father Michael Pederson (melancholy),
and the impact upon his life from childhood and family life,
his dissapointed relationship with Regine his onetime
fiance whom he broke relations deliberately in a caddish way,
becasue he felt it incongruent with his chosen path in life,
and that he was unworthy of her, insultingly, so as to hope he would not break her heart, with before marrying,
in a decision to do so which would haunt his entire life,
and probaly regretted later on, as well.
The affair with "The Corsair" a popular publication
there in Copenhagen which was basically a tabliod,
and that publishers smear campaign maligning
SK over an extended period of time, mocking and ridiculing
him, putting him up for scorn shallowly because the public
this, like a dog barking at someone, mailman, beggar, or king. His sharp and keenly critising mind was often
and substantially and notably directed toward
the church & "christendom" itself, and here
is "your sign" why he was not well
taken then, or ever will be, and why he is
misperceived, misunderstood, misrepresented, or ignored. His ideas are anathema, heretical, undermining
or subversive to christianity to the average christian
who tries to be as such and wants to beieve all, etc. He (Kierkegaard) basically tells us that
Christians aren't real christains, at least most. That most want to be in that category and be taken
and included as such for societal reasons i.e "pretend". Christianity is demanding and harsh, people go to
church sing, pray, etc. but still live as normal people, with all the associated faults and foibles and are not "better." It was more important to put on that face then. He was saying there are very few real and true Christains. Something people do not want to hear. Kierkegaard by and large is not for everyone,
(literacy level, etc.) in this world of declining
lterary standards, but this book is. Lawrence Connor
Rating:
Summary: McKierkegaard, Fast & Easy, a good & enjoyable glimpse of SK
Review: PARABLES OF KIERKEGAARD "A Possibility" (from Stage's on Lifes Way)
starting on Page 104, I found to be particularly
poignant and impressive among the parables presented. I liked this book and still do. :) Very accessible, and interesting even
apart from the whole of his writing,
therefore more digestable to the average person. The other parable mentioned in another review
as most notable is unseemly to note without
mentioning any other, but that is opinion. "A Possibility" is widely regarded
as profound and noteworthy. :) The introduction well describes the purpose and intent
of this book, and of SK's parables, to the readers. Many short parable presented that are witty or amusing. A few longer ones such as "A Possibility." Not definitive as a representative of his thought or writing
if you are looking for anything like a synopsis or condensed
representation of his authorship/ideas/"philosophy"/thought. Enjoyable light(er) reading than trying to delve
into his actual titles, per se, however. :) Soren Kierkegaard's authorship has always
been not commonly well understood, in part
due to his "unique 'method/mode of authorship'",
but more than that, and is somewhat out of
the range of most readers, unfortunately,
however highly regarded by some of intellect
to comprehend his work properly, he has
been represented foolishly at times,
by those who quote him, as in the old
playboy interview style of photo's
and obscure references to SK, taken by many
in the intelligentsia in the 20th cent.
as the "father" of existentialism,
and fashionable to be seen as one familiar
with im and his work, but also rightly viewed
as being influential upon modern ideas. His take on things however to those who don't
even know his name would find very similar
to their own, and not just some silly obscure
neurotic rambling as obscure dense complex
literature is usually perceived and represented as. In some ways his authorship could be summed up
in an extremely oversimplified way as an
exhaustive exposition of the term "subjectivity",
which is the term as buzzword often employed
in attempts at explaining or representing his
thought and ideas/"philosophy", which he was not
regarded as contemporaneously as a "philosopher",
but as a writer, actually quite ridiculed in his lifetime,
after his upbringing and training in seminary (churchdom),
to be a pastor himself, and wrote along multi-level
world views at differing times. His life is almost always presented when discussing him
or his writings. His father Michael Pederson K. (melancholy),
and the impact upon his life from childhood and family life. His dissapointed relationship with Regine Olsen his onetime
fiance whom he broke relations with deliberately in a caddish
way, becasue he felt it incongruent with his chosen path in life,
and that he was unworthy of her, insultingly, so as to hope
he would not break her heart, with before marrying,
in a decision to do so which would haunt his entire life,
and probaly regretted later on, as well. The 'affair' later in his life with "The Corsair" a popular
publication there in Copenhagen which was basically a
tabloid, and that publisher's smear campaign maligning
SK over an extended period of time, mocking and ridiculing
him, putting him up for scorn shallowly because the public likes
this, like a dog barking at someone, mailman, beggar, or king. His sharp and keenly critising mind was often
and substantially and notably directed toward
the church & "christendom" itself, and here
is "your sign" why he was not well
taken then, or ever will be, and why he is
misperceived, misunderstood, misrepresented, or ignored. His ideas are supposedly anathema, heretical, undermining
or subversive, to Christianity and to the average Christian
who desires and tries to be as such and wants to devoutly
beieve all, etc... He (Kierkegaard) basically tells us that
Christians aren't real Christains, at least most. That most want to be in that category and be taken
and included as such for societal reasons, i.e. "pretend". Christianity is demanding and harsh, the people who go to
church sing, pray, etc., but still live as normal people,
with all the associated faults and foibles but are not "better." [It was more important to put on that face then.] He was saying there are very few real and true Christains. Something people do not want to hear. ;) Kierkegaard by and large is not for everyone,
(literacy level, etc.) in this world of declining
lterary standards, but this book is. :D Lawrence Connor
Rating:
Summary: EVEN OUT OF CONTEXT, IT'S A GREAT READ
Review: Soren was a brilliant surveyor of the human soul. Collected in this volume are what amounts to a greatest hits of parables highlighting the discoveries he made along the way that compel the reader to get off the philosophical phence when it comes to life's decisions. Don't sweat the small stuff? More like, Think, Choose, and the small stuff never surfaces. Perhaps the greatest of all his parables is "The Jewel on Thin Ice", and its inclusion here is worth the purcahse price all by itself. If you are familiar with Kierkegaard, you know what a brilliant reference tome this will be. If you are not, this is a great way to begin your examination of a man who was justifiably the Danish Dalai Lhama. His spirituality is immersed in being present in the moment, and would lay the foundation for all existentialist (i.e., Buddhist thinkers in Western trappings) thought in the 20th Century from Husserl and Sartre to Heidegger and Neil Young.
Well done, well worth keeping by your reading lamp. It is a jewel on thin ice well worth risking one's immersion.
<< 1 >>
| 
