Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
|
 |
Postmodern Theory and Biblical Theology : Vanquishing God's Shadow |
List Price: $32.99
Your Price: $32.99 |
 |
|
|
Product Info |
Reviews |
<< 1 >>
Rating:  Summary: A feast for thought but not for the faint of heart Review: This book provides an in-depth treatment of Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Derrida and the relationships between their thought and biblical theology. The author covers their respective attacks on christianity and then, instead of seeking a synthesis of their thought with biblical theology, he draws on the apostle Paul, Pascal, Luther, Kierkegaard, Barth, Bonhoeffer, & Moltmann to establish a counter position. As a grad student in computer science (at the time), I found this book to be rough going. I suspect anyone with an undergraduate course in Philosophy will have a much better time with the book than I had and some experience with literary theory would make it even more accessible. I give it 4 instead of 5 stars because I didn't have the background to confidently give it a highest rating.
Rating:  Summary: A feast for thought but not for the faint of heart Review: This book provides an in-depth treatment of Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Derrida and the relationships between their thought and biblical theology. The author covers their respective attacks on christianity and then, instead of seeking a synthesis of their thought with biblical theology, he draws on the apostle Paul, Pascal, Luther, Kierkegaard, Barth, Bonhoeffer, & Moltmann to establish a counter position. As a grad student in computer science (at the time), I found this book to be rough going. I suspect anyone with an undergraduate course in Philosophy will have a much better time with the book than I had and some experience with literary theory would make it even more accessible. I give it 4 instead of 5 stars because I didn't have the background to confidently give it a highest rating.
<< 1 >>
|
|
|
|