Rating: 
Summary: Should not have wasted my money!
Review: When I heard about how exciting this book was I just had to order it.
I wasted my money.
Not only is it poorly written (she should have hired a ghost writer), making it almost impossible to read; her attempted use of "big" terms and words that were obviously out of place made the style of writing HORRIBLE.
I didn't realize KFOR fired her. ...doesn't surprise me. Why would Hussaini bother to sue channel four if was a terrorist. I would think he would be too busy getting out of town.
There is NO WAY McVeigh would have teamed with Muslims. He was ready to commit suicide to set off the bomb. A suicide bomber will not take money to enact an act of terrorism.
Poor journalism, poor writing. Sad book. Wasted money. Anybody want it?
Rating: 
Summary: seeking the truth
Review: While reading this book, my heart raced and tears came to my eyes. I felt fear and sorrow for the victims and witnesses of the Oklahoma City bombing. Who were the real culprits of this mass murder?
Jayna Davis's book reads like an exciting mystery --a mystery about a truely frightening event: one of the first successful terrorist attacks on the heartland of America involving Middle Eastern terrorist. She presents a great deal of evidence that supports this conclusion. Jayna Davis and the witnesses are to be commended.
This book is a must read for anyone seeking knowledge about terrorism.
Rating:
Summary: Jayna Davis has NO credibility
Review: Why do you think she got fired from her job at KFOR in OKC in the first place? She identified some poor guy as the third terrorist who had NO connection. KFOR is lucky they still have a license to operate.
Rating:
Summary: Superbly documented
Review: With respect, the reader from Bellevue exposes the limitations of his own knowledge in his criticism of Davis' conclusions. Example: the alcohol problem of Hussain al-Hussaini. While alcoholism would not be typical of a Sunni wahhabi terrorist, it would be absolutely in character for a member of Saddam Hussein's special forces. Saddam's special forces were not Islamic extremists, they were thugs and criminals benefiting from a closed-loop system of oppression in Iraq. All Sunnis with little in the way of religious moorings -- that is, NOT wahhabi Sunnis (like al Qaeda members) or Shi'as (like the Iranian regime's leaders and its sponsored insurgents in Hamas and Islamic Jihad) -- the special forces employed by Saddam were loyal only to him. The tattoo described by Davis identified him to me (a career military intelligence officer) as an Iraqi special forces member immediately, well before Davis revealed it later in the book. I do not believe al-Hussaini was a member of the Republican Guard, but rather was in the intelligence service special forces.This is an exceptionally well researched and documented book, in spite of its irritating and adjective-laden syntax. It does not directly imply a link between Hussain al-Hussaini and UBL (again, as indicated by the reader from Bellevue), but rather establishes through existing documentation the link between Terry Nichols, McVeigh's accomplice, and known Islamic associates of UBL who all convened on multiple occasions in the Philippines. You have to read Laurie Mylroie's books to make the leap to Iraqi state sponsorship of either Oklahoma City, the World Trade Center in 1993, or the 9/11 attacks. What Davis and Mylroie have unearthed on that head, while not fully conclusive at this point, is well worth further investigation. I can vouch for their accuracy regarding the foreign intelligence on international Islamic terrorists. What they have discovered inside America is news to me, though -- that's what we need to know more about. Bottom line: read this book.
| 
