Rating: 
Summary: MOST SHOCKING BOOK OF THE TWENIETH CENTURY
Review: (WOW) Thats about all one can say after reading this brillant, verbose and completely convincing book. Macdonald's book really cuts through and pulls the blinds behind the zeitigiest and wisdom of the current age. I know many people know something in the Western world is terribly wrong I mean we have became ashmaed of ourselves our history, our political and social groups have become pathologized, our universites and school are poisining our kids with political correctness ad infintium, and worst of all our defense mechanism to defend our ethnic interests in lands we have been dominant have collapsed.Why are countries in Europe and America the only ones that are open to all peoples of the world? and we are paraylzed to the point were we can do nothing about it. In short our entire race has been decieved by a small hostile ethnocentric group of people who used the tounges of univeralism to fool us to march toward our own extinction. The ideas they spread for us were mainly multiculturaism, cultural pluraism(the model for countires), de-ethnicized extreme individualism, low parental investment,and a total eradication of our group interests. These started with the Boasian school of Anthropology and Horace Kallen( cultural pluraism), The frankfaurt school ( the authortarian personality), 60's Counterculture Revolution ( New Left),The New York intelluctuals and Neoconservatives, Pyschoanaylsis and Freud's cult, and of course the involovement in destroying all restrictions in our immigration policies. This movements and some others were spread in the West like a hydrogen bomb inflitrating every country from United States to Europe and Austraila.They used thier media control, newspaper control, top postions in the univerites and schools to spread this ideas which puts into question all of our fundamental ideas about our people 's survival. Will we survive? the last chapter answers the dymanics to that question using evolutionary models of human group behavior. I really don't want to write a serious review frankly I just dont care. My main point is READ this book before passing judgement, then think about whats going in the world today, then ask some questions. In the end if ones anaylsis of reality is perceptive this book will answer all the questions and more, no other book will. No other book shows us the dark light at the end of the tunnel fast aproaching in Western socities the poltical instability, ethnic conflict, economic breakdown and overall destruction and displacement of our people and civilization- all because of these Jewish intelluctual and political movements in the Twenieth century. Read the book to understand what has happen to us in the Twenieth century and what WILL happen to us if we dont change our behavior(To ethnic collectivism) in the very near future.
Rating:
Summary: The Culture of Critique
Review: A fascinating book! The author shows that much of the academic research in social sciences dominated by Jews is an exercise in deception or self-deception. He explains this behavior in terms of group psychology determined by evolutionary mechanisms. But a few issues require further elaboration or are entirely missing:1) The author's explanation of Marxism as a strategy to emphasize the division of society along lines other than Jew/gentile is open to a question. The most salient feature of Marxism is its apocalyptic messianism. Paradoxically Israeli scholar Gerschom Scholem (whom the author considers over-rated) may have provided a better insight in the origins of Marxism in his book The Messianic Idea in Judaism, in the chapters on Sabbatai Zevi, even though he does not explicitly say so. But the similarity between the two aberrant messianic movements is hard to miss. The author is well aware of traits often found among the Jews such as messianism, self-conceptualization as "the light of the nations", "secret dreams of reversal and triumph", "desire for malignant vengeance", "dark emotions", and tendency towards sectarian, cult-like behavior. But he never uses any of these in his analysis of Marxism. 2) MacDonald notes that Judaism has the best chance of continuation in liberal, individualistic societies. Why would it be in the interest of the Jews to construct totalitarian doctrines such as Marxism? It is not. Marxism is not a product of an adaptive group evolutionary strategy but an extreme, irrational response born out of frustration. 3) The author argues that Jewish radical leftist organizations recruited a few gentiles for the purposes of window dressing. (It sounds a little like the conspiracy theory.) The author makes the case that the Communist Parties of Russia, Poland, Hungary, and USA were initially dominated by Jews. He argues persuasively that these Jews, in spite of their universalistic and internationalist rhetoric, never lost their Jewish identity. Be as it may, the recruitment of the gentiles was not camouflage but proselytization. All the above mentioned parties soon fell under the control of the gentiles and even became anti-Semitic. How could have a few window dressing gentiles got the upper hand in Jewish organizations? Furthermore the communist parties in the Far East probably never had any significant Jewish membership. 4) There is no discussion of the fact that Jews were the most ardent proponents of pan-Germanism in Austria and Germany in the beginning of this century. The author mentions former Trockyists masquerading under the politically correct label of "neoconservatives" around the magazine The Weekly Standard. They advocate establishing an American world empire under the codeword "benevolent global hegemony." The author does not discuss their resemblance to the Jewish pan-Germanists. 5) The author correctly notes the irrationality of doctrines such as psychoanalysis. (He does not mention the irrationality of Marxism.) But there is practically no analysis of why the superior Jewish intellect is unable to discern irrational ideas. The author would probably say that such delusions are a byproduct of group evolutionary strategy. But I presume that the author does not mean by "rationality" (i.e. being in accordance with logic, facts, verifiable) as something that is relative and exists only in the eyes of the beholder. 5) There is no discussion of Gestalt psychology. 6) The author correctly states that monogamy has been the norm in "Western Europe" and polygamy existed in the Orient from Middle East to China. He leaves us guessing if polygamy has been practiced in Greece and Russia. In spite of these shortcomings the book throws plenty of light on a hitherto unanalyzed subject.
Rating: 
Summary: Isn't the only question is he right?
Review: A witty commentator once said that the communists were right about capitalism, but got everything wrong once they started talking about their own ideal. Not quite right, but this fits MacDonald's analysis of White/Jewish relations in the West. His nostalgia for the way America was seems unfounded in the reality. Likewise, I can find no evidence for some of his positions, like that Whites are naturally more inclined to universalism. But concerning Jewish movements, he is quite insightful: Freud, Boas, Horkheimer, the Jewish left, and, more recently, the "neo-conservatives", have all betrayed the ostensible ideals of their fields of study or activism for the sake of ethnic interests.
I am still a liberal, but I can hardly look at the left the same, after seeing such powerful evidence that much of its harsh criticism is merely jingoism from a minority perspective.
Rating:
Summary: Isn't the only question is he right?
Review: A witty commentator once said that the communists were right about capitalism, but got everything wrong once they started talking about their own ideal. Not quite right, but this fits MacDonald's analysis of White/Jewish relations in the West. His nostalgia for the way America was seems unfounded in the reality. Likewise, I can find no evidence for some of his positions, like that Whites are naturally more inclined to universalism. But concerning Jewish movements, he is quite insightful: Freud, Boas, Horkheimer, the Jewish left, and, more recently, the "neo-conservatives", have all betrayed the ostensible ideals of their fields of study or activism for the sake of ethnic interests.
I am still a liberal, but I can hardly look at the left the same, after seeing such powerful evidence that much of its harsh criticism is merely jingoism from a minority perspective.
Rating:
Summary: EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY
Review: Coming from a small mono-ethnic town in Western-Europe I used to have no doubts about the truth as it was presented to me by all kinds of media at that time. It is still the truth for most western people: multiculturalism, interracial marriage, homo- and bisexuality, liberalism towards drugs are all cases that are fought for by honest intellectuals who want to create a better world. The so-called idealists. Moving to a city to study at university I gradually began to see the other side of all these so-called achievements in practice: criminality, violende, divorce, explicit promotion of perversity, prostitution, large-scale heroin addiction etcetera. The strange thing is: West-Europeans have learned to find all this completely normal. After being confronted with the other side of so-called liberal society, the thinking process starts. At first I tried to find the answer to the "why question" mostly in traditional rightwing politics. In Europe, unfortunately, the so-called rightwing does not differ fundamentally from the leftwing in fighting the excesses sketched above. In fact, it is all nearly the same! Except some so-called far-right parties, nearly every party in Western-Europe is pro gay-marriage for example! Living in the US nowadays I know that Republican and Democratic politics can differ to a much greater extent. But to the point: by experience, reading and reconstructing I went on answering the "why question", but with Kevin MacDonald's book a lot of pieces from the big puzzle fell into place. I know that I'm not the only one who has experienced great feelings of guilt on the way to finding the truth about certain sociological phenomena. From their youngest years most western people are subject to an ongoing stream of indoctrination that aims at forbidding to even think about certain facts or opinions. After reading this book nobody can deny that a lot of things presented as liberalism are just ways to divide and confuse Western man. This divide and conquer liberalism has nothing to do with freedom. From my experience in Europe I can say that jews there have many high positions in government, entertainment and other large companies. A lot of these functions have to do with promoting multiculturalism and shaping a nationwide and international thought police that is mostly called anti-racism. Although MacDonald's book is mostly focused on America, the presented theory holds for Europe as well. The most striking aspect of the whole book is the organized thought control by institutions who see in certain opinions a conflict with Jewish interests. This book is one of the biggest eye-openers available to everyone who is anxious to understand what exactly is going on in the Western world.
Rating:
Summary: To Understand the 20th Century:
Review: Everything one ever wanted to know about Freud, Boas, & the Frankfurt School, but was too afraid to ask--and even more afraid to find out. Read it and weep.
Rating:
Summary: A Must Have for Caucasian People
Review: Friends, if your sporting a white hide, you need this book as
well as the other two in MacDonald's series concerning Jewish
influence in white societies. While your at Amazon, get David
Duke's "My Awakening" as well. (...) MacDonald sheds a great deal of light upon that. (...) MacDonald's work is a must
have. (...) This is great stuff. Full of details,
dates, names and events that no goyim (that's you white folks)
should be without. (...) After the great fire, we poor hapless goy will be clutching
our copies of MacDonald's works and hiding from our white lackey
elite stormtroopers and their Jewish jackbooted thugs that compose their administration. These intellectual giants offer their great opinions, concerning what we little people should
think, that we should not be misled by Mr. MacDonalds obvious "anti-semitic" dribble. (..) In twenty years we'll have coins with MacDonald's face on them.
Right along with Hitler's, Benjamin Franklin, Washington,
Luther, Duke and everyone else who tried to warn us about these
people and their cult.
Rating: 
Summary: Who's to blame?
Review: Funny, I thought the decline of the Christian West with its "hierarchic harmony" began with Voltaire and Rousseau. But apparently it took the Jews to really send European culture down the drain. For MacDonald to protest that he is not anti-Semitic is like a fish claiming it isn't wet. He has so immersed himself in the element that he no longer recognizes what it is.
Rating:
Summary: illuminating and profound
Review: have you ever wondered, for example, why we have "black" studies and "jewish" studies but the mere mention of "white" studies is automatically considered racist or anti-semitic? this book, the conclusion to a three part scholarly treatment of judaism and western culture, will absolutely blow your mind. in ten years people will look at this book as THE seminal catalyst to a reinterpretation of 20th century america. read it, but be careful who you talk to about it.
Rating:
Summary: Courageous. Brilliant.
Review: How refreshing to find an authentic scholar and scientist in the generally corrupted social sciences. This is a must read for every American.
| 
