Rating: 
Summary: You go get'em Ann
Review: It's nice to see some one stand up and say what most americans think. I like the fact that she is not "political" in her criticism. She calls it liks she see it.
Rating: 
Summary: of course liberals hate her!
Review: Look at all of these 1-star reviewers! It just goes to show one thing: liberals cannot stand someone who exposes the hypocrisy of THEIR ideology! Keep up the good work, Ann!
Rating: 
Summary: apparently evolution is wrong
Review: This book is good, except for the fact that it was published. I read it to understand how conservatives feel about liberals, but by the time I finished I was angry at every one of them. And with a forward by Rush "Imprison all drug users" Limbaugh, you can't go wrong by saying that this book was written by hypocrits.
Rating:
Summary: AAHHH!!!
Review: I seriously think that poor Ann was dropped on her head as a baby a few to many times. It is quite ironic that she accuses liberals of slander throughout the entire book, when slander is all that comes out of this woman 24/7!
Rating:
Summary: Ann Coulter, crazy
Review: Ive read several of these reviews where people say all kinds of things about how reliable her sources are, and about how she has 780 footnotes. Unfortunetly, your all wrong. I read the book, and there are 780 ENDNOTES. Not footnotes. theres a big different. The book was also horrible, which is to be expected with such a crazy person. If you want proof of the right wing bias in the media, simply go to www.moveon.org, and learn about how CBS censored an anti-bush ad during the super bowl
Rating:
Summary: It appears Ann is right
Review: One can not deny that mainstream media is biased to the left. Look at the political endorsements they provide. The media, by the way, should be there only to report the news, not sway it. It can never be viewed as impartial when it so blatantly aligns itself with the left or any other party for that matter.As I read Ann's book backed with many foot notes to support her views (she did not pull these words out of a hat) I find that those obviously from the left have done exactly what she discusses in her book: Call names, try to assassinate character in a most cruel and childish way. Not really refuting anything she says other than with the cruel rhetoric most often displayed by the left. I have read reviews calling Ann coulter various names such as "toad, hag, wind bag, her book is toilet paper," etc... Perhaps she was not so far away from printing the truth afterall...
Rating:
Summary: true conservatives speak out against this drivel!
Review: "townhall.com" is a conservative website which features articles by the likes of Ann Coulter, Joe Scarborough, Phyllis Schlafly, Pat Buchanan, Neil Cavuto, Oliver North, "David" Limbaugh, etc., etc., etc. I was surprised to find an advertisement button on the site which states that every purchase made from "Amazon Books" helps support "townhall.com." Others may be interested to know that. If I'd known that I was supportiing demagoguery, I'd have made several earlier book purchases from another source. I will shop elsewhere from now on.
Rating:
Summary: EVEIDENCE THAT WE, THE RIGHT, ARE RIGHT!
Review: Coulter exposes the left's lies, false alligations, and biased troughout the media. If you like the truth (which the left doesnt) then this book is for you. Don't be spewed with propaganda from Moore or Franken, get the truth from one of the greatest Americans who ever put pen on paper. Coulter exposes the left with vigoreous force and courage. Because of her honesty the left has smeared her and tried to ruin her. But the right is strong and the American people know the truth when they see it and teh left will not succeed. Coulter supports her claims and opens everyones eyes to the left's assualt against America.
Rating:
Summary: Ugh...
Review: Oh, I loathe Ann Coutler. She seems to blame liberals for almost EVERYTHING!!! This is further proof that mature adults sometimes act like little children. What has happened...
Rating:
Summary: So funny
Review: This is mean to be entirly irony and satire right? I mean she can't seriously mean most of the things she says.... right? And shouldn't the Book be Libel since she review mostly written and broadcast work (having it captioned and then broadcast fits the description of libelious) I found it a fun read and a boost to my ego since I'm a poor student and knowing someone who can get by so well with such.... well C grade work makes me feel secure about my own future.
Just to make sure you understand, this was read as a book satire, I mean no sane person can read it, look at the facts and sources cited (which btw sometimes proves the counterpoint) and mean it.
I recommend you pick up the book if only to mock her at the water-cooler with other adults.
| 
